2.1 sec in total
262 ms
1.4 sec
443 ms
Click here to check amazing M Ltool content for South Korea. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about m.ltool.net
You can make your own real English name. / You can make your own real Japanese name. / Change Simplified Chinese Characters to Traditional
Visit m.ltool.netWe analyzed M.ltool.net page load time and found that the first response time was 262 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
m.ltool.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.3 s
98/100
10%
Value2.6 s
88/100
25%
Value6.4 s
40/100
10%
Value1,770 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.155
74/100
15%
Value12.6 s
14/100
10%
262 ms
185 ms
186 ms
3 ms
125 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original M.ltool.net, 8% (5 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 6% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (398 ms) belongs to the original domain M.ltool.net.
Page size can be reduced by 428.9 kB (58%)
742.9 kB
314.0 kB
In fact, the total size of M.ltool.net main page is 742.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 645.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 53.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.4 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. M Ltool images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 353.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 353.3 kB or 55% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. M.ltool.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.2 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (48%)
63
33
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of M Ltool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
m.ltool.net
262 ms
javascript20161124.js
185 ms
origin_style20170302.css
186 ms
adsbygoogle.js
3 ms
share_ad.css
125 ms
allfreeimages.css
125 ms
ipipipip.css
126 ms
ca-pub-8085837453460834.js
86 ms
zrt_lookup.html
132 ms
show_ads_impl.js
44 ms
gpt.js
69 ms
widgets.js
63 ms
all.js
62 ms
ga.js
62 ms
sweetsdeco_en.gif
208 ms
allfreeimages_en.gif
120 ms
main_01.gif
120 ms
main_02.gif
120 ms
main_03.gif
120 ms
main_04.gif
120 ms
main_05.gif
197 ms
main_06.gif
196 ms
main_07.gif
196 ms
main_08.gif
195 ms
main_09.gif
195 ms
main_10.gif
284 ms
main_11.gif
283 ms
main_12.gif
283 ms
main_13.gif
277 ms
main_14.gif
276 ms
main_15.gif
307 ms
main_16.gif
318 ms
main_17.gif
332 ms
main_18.gif
342 ms
main_19.gif
336 ms
main_20.gif
342 ms
main_21.gif
359 ms
main_22.gif
381 ms
main_23.gif
382 ms
main_24.gif
398 ms
ads
228 ms
osd.js
83 ms
pubads_impl_147.js
107 ms
ads
227 ms
__utm.gif
58 ms
button.3ccb64e61d4c01fae12cd2b0ed9b2bab.js
41 ms
ads
176 ms
169 ms
pla
72 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
55 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
74 ms
tweet_button.f8c8d971a6ac545cf416e3c1ad4bbc65.en.html
46 ms
ads
71 ms
container.html
25 ms
ads.js
54 ms
osd_listener.js
52 ms
adcore_pc_inline.js
6 ms
jot
77 ms
ad_spot.aspx
340 ms
style.css
158 ms
ad_creative.ashx
35 ms
RestoreXidToMediaStorage.html
40 ms
like.php
74 ms
lH1ibRl5GKq.png
8 ms
m.ltool.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
m.ltool.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
m.ltool.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise M.ltool.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that M.ltool.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
m.ltool.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of M Ltool. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: