Tools & Wizards About Us
member.lifelock.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

member.lifelock.com

Sign In - Official Site | Norton Account Sign In & Set Up

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

17 ms

Resources Loaded

870 ms

Page Rendered

117 ms

member.lifelock.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Member Lifelock content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about member.lifelock.com

Log in to your Norton account. Sign in to enter your product key, access your account, manage your subscription, and extend your Norton protection to PC, Mac, Android, and iOS devices. If you don’t al...

Visit member.lifelock.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Member.lifelock.com page load time and found that the first response time was 17 ms and then it took 987 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

member.lifelock.com performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.3 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.3 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value820 ms

35/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.4 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

member.lifelock.com

17 ms

member.lifelock.com

31 ms

ruxitagentjs_ICANVfghqrux_10295240705110949.js

24 ms

tailwind.eedc50607d621f0f.css

58 ms

vendor.7064e94accc15bcc.css

95 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Member.lifelock.com, 31% (8 requests) were made to Cdn.lifelock.com and 12% (3 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (528 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.rawgit.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 334.9 kB (24%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Member.lifelock.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 7.4 kB
  • After minification 7.4 kB
  • After compression 2.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.8 kB or 64% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 281.5 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Member Lifelock needs image optimization as it can save up to 281.5 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 47.9 kB

  • Original 52.2 kB
  • After minification 15.6 kB
  • After compression 4.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 47.9 kB or 92% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 773 B

  • Original 8.3 kB
  • After minification 8.3 kB
  • After compression 7.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Member.lifelock.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (71%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Member Lifelock. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

member.lifelock.com

member.lifelock.com

17 ms

member.lifelock.com

member.lifelock.com

31 ms

ruxitagentjs_ICANVfghqrux_10295240705110949.js

ruxitagentjs_ICANVfghqrux_10295240705110949.js

24 ms

tailwind.eedc50607d621f0f.css

tailwind.eedc50607d621f0f.css

58 ms

vendor.7064e94accc15bcc.css

vendor.7064e94accc15bcc.css

95 ms

app.ad4627edf30dcae8.css

app.ad4627edf30dcae8.css

75 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

72 ms

env.js

env.js

142 ms

efx-consumer-api-client_0.1.2.js

efx-consumer-api-client_0.1.2.js

109 ms

chartist.min.js

chartist.min.js

74 ms

lrChartistTooltip.js

lrChartistTooltip.js

111 ms

chartist-plugin-pointlabels.min.js

chartist-plugin-pointlabels.min.js

119 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

109 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

109 ms

materialize.min.js

materialize.min.js

112 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

49 ms

picturefill.min.js

picturefill.min.js

528 ms

vendor-8c4a5c72.js

vendor-8c4a5c72.js

108 ms

bundle-bec2096a.js

bundle-bec2096a.js

110 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

418 ms

icon_chrome.png

icon_chrome.png

162 ms

icon_firefox.png

icon_firefox.png

133 ms

icon_safari.png

icon_safari.png

228 ms

icon_ie.png

icon_ie.png

300 ms

31130D_8_0.woff

31130D_8_0.woff

68 ms

picturefill.min.js

picturefill.min.js

47 ms

Accessibility Review

member.lifelock.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

member.lifelock.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

member.lifelock.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Member.lifelock.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Member.lifelock.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

member.lifelock.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Member Lifelock. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: