Tools & Wizards About Us
study.lsbf.org.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

study.lsbf.org.uk

Log in to canvas

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

146 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

132 ms

study.lsbf.org.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit study.lsbf.org.uk now to see the best up-to-date Study Lsbf content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about study.lsbf.org.uk

Visit study.lsbf.org.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Study.lsbf.org.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 146 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

study.lsbf.org.uk performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

26/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

62/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value540 ms

55/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.0 s

42/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

study.lsbf.org.uk

146 ms

study.lsbf.org.uk

298 ms

login

86 ms

canvas

168 ms

css

31 ms

Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 16% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Study.lsbf.org.uk, 36% (9 requests) were made to Lsbf-assets.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com and 12% (3 requests) were made to Iacanvas.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (485 ms) relates to the external source Lsbf-assets.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 110.5 kB (17%)

Content Size

637.6 kB

After Optimization

527.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Study.lsbf.org.uk main page is 637.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 529.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 16.8 kB

  • Original 23.2 kB
  • After minification 21.7 kB
  • After compression 6.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.8 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 7.4 kB
  • After minification 5.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Study Lsbf needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.5 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 23.7 kB

  • Original 529.5 kB
  • After minification 527.6 kB
  • After compression 505.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 68.3 kB

  • Original 77.5 kB
  • After minification 65.6 kB
  • After compression 9.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Study.lsbf.org.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 68.3 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (83%)

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Study Lsbf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

study.lsbf.org.uk

study.lsbf.org.uk

146 ms

study.lsbf.org.uk

study.lsbf.org.uk

298 ms

login

login

86 ms

canvas

canvas

168 ms

css

css

31 ms

variables-8391c84da435c9cfceea2b2b3317ff66.css

variables-8391c84da435c9cfceea2b2b3317ff66.css

332 ms

common-e2bca4af77.css

common-e2bca4af77.css

397 ms

login-172cde0ffb.css

login-172cde0ffb.css

341 ms

canvasGlobal.css

canvasGlobal.css

463 ms

ie11-polyfill-832c690556.js

ie11-polyfill-832c690556.js

382 ms

fetch.min.js

fetch.min.js

25 ms

css

css

20 ms

variables-8391c84da435c9cfceea2b2b3317ff66.js

variables-8391c84da435c9cfceea2b2b3317ff66.js

102 ms

London-cbb37f168d.js

London-cbb37f168d.js

95 ms

en_GB-31745e04c9.js

en_GB-31745e04c9.js

104 ms

en-gb-c-e4a3eaf631.js

en-gb-c-e4a3eaf631.js

103 ms

main-e-ff721e3aa7.js

main-e-ff721e3aa7.js

485 ms

largerlogo.png

largerlogo.png

77 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf

24 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf

32 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf

38 ms

canvasGlobal.js

canvasGlobal.js

112 ms

web_surveys.js

web_surveys.js

119 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

22 ms

widget_core-24.8.0.js

widget_core-24.8.0.js

33 ms

Accessibility Review

study.lsbf.org.uk accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

study.lsbf.org.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

study.lsbf.org.uk SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Study.lsbf.org.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Study.lsbf.org.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

study.lsbf.org.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Study Lsbf. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: