4.1 sec in total
254 ms
3.4 sec
454 ms
Welcome to wyoggok.ltool.net homepage info - get ready to check Wyoggok Ltool best content for South Korea right away, or after learning these important things about wyoggok.ltool.net
You can make your own real English name. / You can make your own real Japanese name. / Change Simplified Chinese Characters to Traditional
Visit wyoggok.ltool.netWe analyzed Wyoggok.ltool.net page load time and found that the first response time was 254 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
wyoggok.ltool.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.4 s
97/100
10%
Value2.4 s
91/100
25%
Value8.1 s
21/100
10%
Value1,770 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.29
41/100
15%
Value15.0 s
8/100
10%
254 ms
70 ms
137 ms
217 ms
100 ms
Our browser made a total of 120 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Wyoggok.ltool.net, 31% (37 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 18% (21 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 317.3 kB (22%)
1.4 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Wyoggok.ltool.net main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 773.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 80.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.6 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wyoggok Ltool images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 106.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 106.8 kB or 14% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 121.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wyoggok.ltool.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 121.2 kB or 90% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 77 (68%)
114
37
The browser has sent 114 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wyoggok Ltool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wyoggok.ltool.net
254 ms
pub-8085837453460834
70 ms
javascript20161124.js
137 ms
origin_style20180114.css
217 ms
adsbygoogle.js
100 ms
share_ad.css
87 ms
cssgenerators.css
342 ms
ipipipip.css
142 ms
js
78 ms
show_ads_impl.js
298 ms
sweetsdeco_en.gif
146 ms
allfreeimages_en.gif
82 ms
widgets.js
29 ms
all.js
51 ms
widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html
114 ms
all.js
67 ms
zrt_lookup.html
86 ms
ads
809 ms
settings
78 ms
ads
566 ms
ads
548 ms
ads
465 ms
ads
252 ms
ads
629 ms
ads
697 ms
ads
1245 ms
ads
1118 ms
button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js
4 ms
ads
1106 ms
embeds
26 ms
tweet_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.en.html
13 ms
gen_204
151 ms
pixel
478 ms
8788295811107189310
48 ms
abg_lite.js
28 ms
omrhp.js
34 ms
Q12zgMmT.js
42 ms
window_focus.js
42 ms
qs_click_protection.js
43 ms
ufs_web_display.js
39 ms
icon.png
537 ms
62bHydCX.html
16 ms
pixel
387 ms
16093992098518513688
68 ms
gen_204
262 ms
pixel
314 ms
14790517263240591731
79 ms
t.png
335 ms
245 ms
gen_204
253 ms
444604e78ca73015217834c7b910356d.js
1008 ms
load_preloaded_resource.js
250 ms
1ba345c263b2fff245ff25f2192186ac.js
1189 ms
a16a95ed800df405f934307ce64d3d76.js
1376 ms
abg_lite.js
249 ms
5be83aa116b77ea6731c6ab78f30609e.js
1411 ms
pixel
597 ms
7023776682403587241
255 ms
gen_204
150 ms
XCSEbScD2TvrcCbmOAwzw3FcKGiduMdvSHMNJDgnGcc.js
146 ms
pixel
498 ms
8324732904621422289
263 ms
gen_204
438 ms
reactive_library.js
535 ms
ca-pub-8085837453460834
529 ms
activeview
523 ms
activeview
521 ms
activeview
522 ms
activeview
536 ms
pixel
562 ms
pixel
494 ms
activeview
404 ms
gen_204
403 ms
activeview
401 ms
gen_204
402 ms
activeview
575 ms
pixel
350 ms
gen_204
455 ms
activeview
457 ms
34b788c3a3ad245bbcc61834a02eba26.js
457 ms
mdc_list_min.js
455 ms
mdc_menu_min.js
462 ms
mdc_menu_surface.min.js
440 ms
mdc_select_min.js
452 ms
mdc_textfield_min.js
451 ms
mdc_list_min.css
451 ms
mdc_menu_min.css
527 ms
mdc_menu_surface_min.css
523 ms
mdc_select_min.css
524 ms
mdc_textfield_min.css
525 ms
266f5dd12a473e4700d2f8d71289a672.js
523 ms
fullscreen_api_adapter.js
254 ms
interstitial_ad_frame.js
447 ms
pixel
469 ms
5493739058641571146
466 ms
t.png
241 ms
458 ms
feedback_grey600_24dp.png
446 ms
settings_grey600_24dp.png
446 ms
gen_204
446 ms
pixel
396 ms
pixel
395 ms
rum
267 ms
um
226 ms
bounce
223 ms
partner
53 ms
activeview
347 ms
pixel
246 ms
pixel
245 ms
sync
220 ms
pixel
121 ms
partner
52 ms
14763004658117789537
118 ms
activeview
206 ms
14763004658117789537
209 ms
rum
104 ms
sd
100 ms
css
142 ms
pixel
79 ms
Y16-9k_leQJvG3Q5vrkxkKUWjGmjQjFi00_HgyssuhY.js
25 ms
wyoggok.ltool.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
wyoggok.ltool.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
wyoggok.ltool.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wyoggok.ltool.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wyoggok.ltool.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wyoggok.ltool.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wyoggok Ltool. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: