7.3 sec in total
2 sec
4.8 sec
541 ms
Visit magicmirror.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Magic Mirror content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about magicmirror.co.uk
Huge Range of Magic Mirrors For Sale. Perfect for Events | Hospitality | Leisure | Retail. Prices from £4299+VAT
Visit magicmirror.co.ukWe analyzed Magicmirror.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
magicmirror.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value15.0 s
0/100
10%
Value17.4 s
0/100
25%
Value25.8 s
0/100
10%
Value390 ms
69/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value31.2 s
0/100
10%
1957 ms
304 ms
63 ms
319 ms
405 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Magicmirror.co.uk, 9% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Magicmirror.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (40%)
4.6 MB
2.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Magicmirror.co.uk main page is 4.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 73.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 145.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Magic Mirror images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 447.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 447.3 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Magicmirror.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (50%)
68
34
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Magic Mirror. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.magicmirror.co.uk
1957 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
304 ms
font-awesome.min.css
63 ms
frontend.css
319 ms
animate.css
405 ms
frontend.css
209 ms
font-awesome.min.css
294 ms
frontend.css
397 ms
css
21 ms
styles.css
407 ms
tp_twitter_plugin.css
392 ms
media.css
441 ms
styles.css
762 ms
theme-icons.css
597 ms
css
34 ms
css
34 ms
style.css
492 ms
custom.css
498 ms
js_composer.min.css
1361 ms
components-production.min.css
708 ms
theme-options-production.css
688 ms
jquery.js
802 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
785 ms
frontend.js
814 ms
css
13 ms
frontend.js
123 ms
jquery.form.min.js
106 ms
scripts.js
106 ms
smoothscroll.js
93 ms
comment-reply.min.js
114 ms
scripts.js
469 ms
wp-embed.min.js
204 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
220 ms
api.js
30 ms
components-production.min.js
212 ms
MagicPhotoMirror165146.png
318 ms
MagicMirrorBackRepeat.png
323 ms
game_changing-1024x152.jpg
316 ms
Marriott-Logo-300W.png
314 ms
LuisVuitton111H.png
316 ms
Intu11.png
313 ms
Giraffe111.png
324 ms
Mill111.png
323 ms
MagicPhotoMirrorFlite250.png
323 ms
SEMirror250.png
324 ms
BeautyMirrorPNG.png
324 ms
RetroMirrorPNG.png
325 ms
MagicMirrorBoothFull.png
381 ms
MagicSketch250.png
382 ms
MirrorBoothprinter1.png
380 ms
MirrorIcon2.png
381 ms
LoveMirrorBooth.png
381 ms
MagicFliteLED-niuuyta64t4ygxw2729qsiptsx1sasyjz7koaalb3k.jpg
576 ms
MagicFliteLED3-niuuyokz6myiuw2vyi8ly1witzoy8bfwakb8vws9yo.jpg
447 ms
MagicFliteLED2-niuuyrehr52dtpysi1ghnj6wm5b1ver3ay9pbqo3g0.jpg
608 ms
Hollywood-niutkf5nqk5k1j36ga3s48i7b9fdmywlpshk29b4og.jpg
807 ms
ChesterfieldSEb-niutkksovkd9z6uzjcjjj72yvknkx5izqkegxx2rn4.jpg
539 ms
ChesterfieldSE-niutkphvtqjpl8o5rwkodnw9ui0ezn1nf7nwcavss0.jpg
544 ms
MagicMirrorwithCarpet-niuuyh29nyo8a0dt6ezle3su2wq0iqm1lj3d1p3fcg.jpg
543 ms
SELED1-niuuympasyvy7o5m9hfct2dln7y7sx8fmb09xcv2b4.jpg
634 ms
dummy-1-mpgfuebee6918eph9totgdbl3sy5irr3p448629i0g.png
632 ms
HollywoodBlackMirror.png
651 ms
font
281 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-s.woff
285 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff
284 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff
285 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHw.woff
286 ms
QGY2z_kZZAGCONcK2A4bGOj0I_1Y5tj1.woff
288 ms
QGYpz_kZZAGCONcK2A4bGOj8mNhL.woff
286 ms
theme-icons.woff
666 ms
fonts-icomoon.woff
689 ms
Pe-icon-line.woff
699 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
700 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
762 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
12 ms
analytics.js
167 ms
jquery.ajax.portfolio.js
513 ms
ajax-loader.gif
516 ms
collect
31 ms
collect
27 ms
js
62 ms
ga-audiences
14 ms
magicmirror.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
magicmirror.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
magicmirror.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Magicmirror.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Magicmirror.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
magicmirror.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Magic Mirror. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: