Tools & Wizards About Us
mail-click.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 54

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    19% of websites

mail-click.ru

Mail-Click.ru - стабильная система рекламы и заработка

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

573 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

104 ms

mail-click.ru screenshot

About Website

Welcome to mail-click.ru homepage info - get ready to check Mail Click best content for Kazakhstan right away, or after learning these important things about mail-click.ru

Сервис Раскрутки Сайтов.Раскрутка заработок в интернет.

Visit mail-click.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Mail-click.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 573 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mail-click.ru performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

74/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.2 s

20/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,370 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.2 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mail-click.ru

573 ms

style.css

129 ms

openapi.js

360 ms

plusone.js

21 ms

share.js

401 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 22% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Mail-click.ru, 14% (9 requests) were made to St6-21.vk.com and 11% (7 requests) were made to Rtbw.acint.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (883 ms) relates to the external source Cdn-rtb.sape.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 99.3 kB (20%)

Content Size

496.5 kB

After Optimization

397.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mail-click.ru main page is 496.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 295.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 36.8 kB

  • Original 47.0 kB
  • After minification 46.2 kB
  • After compression 10.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 11.9 kB
  • After minification 10.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Mail Click needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.5 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 23.3 kB

  • Original 295.2 kB
  • After minification 295.2 kB
  • After compression 271.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 37.7 kB

  • Original 142.5 kB
  • After minification 142.0 kB
  • After compression 104.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mail-click.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 37.7 kB or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (68%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mail Click. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

mail-click.ru

mail-click.ru

573 ms

style.css

style.css

129 ms

openapi.js

openapi.js

360 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

21 ms

share.js

share.js

401 ms

22946.js

22946.js

883 ms

top100.jcn

top100.jcn

242 ms

top100.jcn

top100.jcn

872 ms

openapi.a2ed73393cad04481c1dfb3f7794921f.js

openapi.a2ed73393cad04481c1dfb3f7794921f.js

229 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

15 ms

design5_02.gif

design5_02.gif

258 ms

blue_rus.gif

blue_rus.gif

487 ms

design5_06.gif

design5_06.gif

256 ms

design5_add.gif

design5_add.gif

257 ms

design5_07.gif

design5_07.gif

256 ms

design5_10.gif

design5_10.gif

257 ms

design5_09.gif

design5_09.gif

258 ms

attestated3.gif

attestated3.gif

384 ms

getimg.jpeg

getimg.jpeg

384 ms

upload.gif

upload.gif

115 ms

widget_like.php

widget_like.php

279 ms

sendmail.inc.php

sendmail.inc.php

405 ms

design5_11.gif

design5_11.gif

346 ms

design5_04.gif

design5_04.gif

346 ms

design5_12.gif

design5_12.gif

476 ms

aci.js

aci.js

667 ms

b-share.png

b-share.png

184 ms

watch.js

watch.js

11 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

9 ms

fastbutton

fastbutton

17 ms

b-share-icon.png

b-share-icon.png

263 ms

b-share-popup_down__tail.png

b-share-popup_down__tail.png

355 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

27 ms

3604799710-postmessagerelay.js

3604799710-postmessagerelay.js

20 ms

rpc:shindig_random.js

rpc:shindig_random.js

8 ms

developers.google.com

developers.google.com

714 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

4 ms

loader_nav210011395769_3.js

loader_nav210011395769_3.js

290 ms

lite.ca486089.css

lite.ca486089.css

659 ms

lang3_2.js

lang3_2.js

697 ms

c3d11fba.a7640b83.js

c3d11fba.a7640b83.js

520 ms

vkui.43318ab6.css

vkui.43318ab6.css

691 ms

xdm.js

xdm.js

519 ms

widgets.d2d14ebe.css

widgets.d2d14ebe.css

532 ms

al_like.js

al_like.js

532 ms

base.4d099727.css

base.4d099727.css

636 ms

blue_rus.gif

blue_rus.gif

600 ms

lite.bcf10ece3464fec8b554bde483fa2494.js

lite.bcf10ece3464fec8b554bde483fa2494.js

243 ms

like_widget.png

like_widget.png

89 ms

upload.gif

upload.gif

89 ms

1

1

771 ms

1

1

777 ms

657 ms

watch.js

watch.js

0 ms

ymcode

ymcode

661 ms

1

1

779 ms

1

1

783 ms

1

1

788 ms

1

1

789 ms

1

1

229 ms

1

1

250 ms

3

3

242 ms

watch.js

watch.js

1 ms

Accessibility Review

mail-click.ru accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

mail-click.ru best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

mail-click.ru SEO score

54

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1251

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mail-click.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Mail-click.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

mail-click.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mail Click. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: