4.8 sec in total
661 ms
3.9 sec
234 ms
Welcome to mailcat.cat homepage info - get ready to check Mail Cat best content for Spain right away, or after learning these important things about mailcat.cat
MailCat.Cat proporciona Email, amb domini .CAT, a la comunitat de catalanoparlants relacionats amb la llengua i la cultura catalanes.
Visit mailcat.catWe analyzed Mailcat.cat page load time and found that the first response time was 661 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
mailcat.cat performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.1 s
3/100
10%
Value6.1 s
12/100
25%
Value16.6 s
0/100
10%
Value11,280 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.148
76/100
15%
Value21.7 s
1/100
10%
661 ms
588 ms
310 ms
487 ms
321 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Mailcat.cat, 17% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Mailcat.cat.
Page size can be reduced by 676.0 kB (60%)
1.1 MB
459.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Mailcat.cat main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 535.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 246.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 246.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Mail Cat needs image optimization as it can save up to 20.9 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 16.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 16.1 kB or 14% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 392.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mailcat.cat needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 392.5 kB or 73% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (75%)
61
15
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mail Cat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
mailcat.cat
661 ms
mailcat.cat
588 ms
e4gei.css
310 ms
iege.css
487 ms
e4gei.css
321 ms
iege.css
326 ms
css
27 ms
hq8oq.css
229 ms
css
32 ms
f98v0.css
310 ms
e4gei.js
324 ms
iege.js
317 ms
iege.js
293 ms
6vus.js
566 ms
js
60 ms
hq8oq.css
422 ms
css
24 ms
4p8n6.css
496 ms
dtgsnonce.js
415 ms
wpcf7r-fe.js
415 ms
index.js
453 ms
index.js
497 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
495 ms
js.cookie.min.js
501 ms
woocommerce.min.js
631 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
632 ms
scripts.min.js
750 ms
smoothscroll.js
604 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
602 ms
easypiechart.js
633 ms
salvattore.js
633 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
719 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
719 ms
common.js
719 ms
scripts.js
1001 ms
api.js
61 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1000 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1000 ms
index.js
999 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
999 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
999 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
1175 ms
sticky-elements.js
1240 ms
logo_icono_mailcat_color.png
669 ms
dummy.png
639 ms
Blog-MailCat.png
882 ms
Llei-de-proteccio-de-dades-MailCat-400x250.jpg
638 ms
Inici-MaiCat-MailCat-400x250.jpeg
881 ms
Certificat-SSL-MailCat-400x250.png
879 ms
Logo_MailCat_ver_color_512x512.png
879 ms
analytics.js
121 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
121 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
346 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
413 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
413 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf
436 ms
MwQ5bhbm2POE2V9BOA.ttf
438 ms
modules.ttf
799 ms
k3k6o8UDI-1M0wlSV9XAw6lQkqWY8Q82sJaRE-NWIDdgffTT0zRZ9xds.ttf
439 ms
k3k6o8UDI-1M0wlSV9XAw6lQkqWY8Q82sJaRE-NWIDdgffTT6jRZ9xds.ttf
440 ms
k3k6o8UDI-1M0wlSV9XAw6lQkqWY8Q82sJaRE-NWIDdgffTTBjNZ9xds.ttf
436 ms
k3k6o8UDI-1M0wlSV9XAw6lQkqWY8Q82sJaRE-NWIDdgffTTNDNZ9xds.ttf
435 ms
collect
102 ms
collect
92 ms
recaptcha__en.js
89 ms
collect
111 ms
ga-audiences
17 ms
anchor
70 ms
mailcat.cat
1108 ms
styles__ltr.css
68 ms
recaptcha__en.js
72 ms
webworker.js
134 ms
logo_48.png
101 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
21 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
21 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
23 ms
recaptcha__en.js
29 ms
e4gei.css
101 ms
mailcat.cat accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
mailcat.cat best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
mailcat.cat SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
CA
CA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mailcat.cat can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Catalan is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mailcat.cat main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mailcat.cat
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mail Cat. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: