Tools & Wizards About Us
mailcot.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 59

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

mailcot.com

Mailcot

Page Load Speed

5.4 sec in total

First Response

31 ms

Resources Loaded

5.1 sec

Page Rendered

246 ms

mailcot.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Mailcot content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mailcot.com

Mailcot - Platform to connect & Grow your business

Visit mailcot.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mailcot.com page load time and found that the first response time was 31 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mailcot.com performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.4 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value680 ms

43/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.4 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mailcot.com

31 ms

www.migomail.com

3226 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

69 ms

post-39177.css

100 ms

style.min.css

134 ms

Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Mailcot.com, 84% (73 requests) were made to Migomail.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) relates to the external source Migomail.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 336.3 kB (29%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

826.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mailcot.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 446.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 261.1 kB

  • Original 299.9 kB
  • After minification 288.3 kB
  • After compression 38.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 261.1 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 20.4 kB

  • Original 141.7 kB
  • After minification 121.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Mailcot needs image optimization as it can save up to 20.4 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 12.8 kB

  • Original 446.2 kB
  • After minification 446.2 kB
  • After compression 433.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 42.0 kB

  • Original 274.9 kB
  • After minification 274.1 kB
  • After compression 232.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mailcot.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 42.0 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 70 (91%)

Requests Now

77

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mailcot. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 35 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

mailcot.com

mailcot.com

31 ms

www.migomail.com

www.migomail.com

3226 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

69 ms

post-39177.css

post-39177.css

100 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

134 ms

be-grid.min.css

be-grid.min.css

102 ms

tatsu.min.css

tatsu.min.css

143 ms

exponent-modules.min.css

exponent-modules.min.css

100 ms

typehub-public.css

typehub-public.css

104 ms

arf_front.css

arf_front.css

139 ms

animate.css

animate.css

137 ms

maincss_materialize_100.css

maincss_materialize_100.css

135 ms

css

css

32 ms

tatsu-icons.css

tatsu-icons.css

147 ms

icons.css

icons.css

168 ms

vendor.min.css

vendor.min.css

172 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

203 ms

style.css

style.css

170 ms

ekiticons.css

ekiticons.css

179 ms

enlighterjs.min.css

enlighterjs.min.css

176 ms

widget-styles.css

widget-styles.css

246 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

207 ms

css

css

47 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

239 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

211 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

218 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

242 ms

webfont.min.js

webfont.min.js

243 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

277 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

38 ms

post-38884.css

post-38884.css

749 ms

post-38971.css

post-38971.css

750 ms

tipso.min.css

tipso.min.css

750 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

751 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

867 ms

post-5.css

post-5.css

868 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

868 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

869 ms

css

css

25 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

870 ms

asyncloader.min.js

asyncloader.min.js

870 ms

js

js

63 ms

helpers.min.js

helpers.min.js

875 ms

debouncedresize.min.js

debouncedresize.min.js

837 ms

portfolio.min.js

portfolio.min.js

809 ms

exp-modules.min.js

exp-modules.min.js

806 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

807 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

809 ms

es6-promise.auto.min.js

es6-promise.auto.min.js

773 ms

css

css

19 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

773 ms

accordion.min.js

accordion.min.js

768 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

768 ms

tatsu.min.js

tatsu.min.js

763 ms

tatsu-header.min.js

tatsu-header.min.js

762 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

743 ms

frontend-script.js

frontend-script.js

740 ms

widget-scripts.js

widget-scripts.js

739 ms

enlighterjs.min.js

enlighterjs.min.js

734 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

728 ms

jqBootstrapValidation.js

jqBootstrapValidation.js

705 ms

tipso.min.js

tipso.min.js

705 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

701 ms

arforms.js

arforms.js

696 ms

arf_conditional_logic.js

arf_conditional_logic.js

672 ms

arf_modal_js.js

arf_modal_js.js

672 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

671 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

637 ms

SMTP-Service-1-1.webp

SMTP-Service-1-1.webp

540 ms

sms-a2p.jpeg

sms-a2p.jpeg

913 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

536 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

535 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

535 ms

animate-circle.min.js

animate-circle.min.js

534 ms

elementor.js

elementor.js

417 ms

migomail_w-1024x336.png

migomail_w-1024x336.png

416 ms

clients-1.webp

clients-1.webp

756 ms

smtp-reseller.jpg

smtp-reseller.jpg

755 ms

cropped-logo-default.png

cropped-logo-default.png

687 ms

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKfw7z.ttf

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKfw7z.ttf

386 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3jsGyI.ttf

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3jsGyI.ttf

656 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzjsGyI.ttf

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzjsGyI.ttf

657 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjsGyI.ttf

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjsGyI.ttf

657 ms

elementskit.woff

elementskit.woff

842 ms

tatsu-icons.ttf

tatsu-icons.ttf

726 ms

exponent.ttf

exponent.ttf

658 ms

1gfko05he

1gfko05he

406 ms

Accessibility Review

mailcot.com accessibility score

59

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

mailcot.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

mailcot.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mailcot.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mailcot.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

mailcot.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mailcot. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: