11.1 sec in total
4 sec
6.5 sec
514 ms
Welcome to maintenancer.com homepage info - get ready to check Maintenancer best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about maintenancer.com
WordPress Support & Hosting. Experts have you covered. Optimized WordPress Servers and Site Management services. Enterprise class, custom built for WP
Visit maintenancer.comWe analyzed Maintenancer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 4 sec and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
maintenancer.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.4 s
1/100
10%
Value17.1 s
0/100
25%
Value11.7 s
4/100
10%
Value1,620 ms
12/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value17.0 s
4/100
10%
4042 ms
579 ms
340 ms
161 ms
163 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Maintenancer.com, 15% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4 sec) belongs to the original domain Maintenancer.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (41%)
2.5 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Maintenancer.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.6 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Maintenancer images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 170.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 170.7 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 830.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Maintenancer.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 830.0 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (43%)
40
23
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Maintenancer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
maintenancer.com
4042 ms
www.maintenancer.com
579 ms
default.include.c111a4.js
340 ms
styles.css
161 ms
jquery.form.min.js
163 ms
scripts.js
167 ms
wp-embed.min.js
169 ms
default.include-footer.55d0bd.js
726 ms
default.include.2dd6ca.css
559 ms
analytics.js
46 ms
chat.png
105 ms
close_side_menu.png
107 ms
maintenancer-logo.png
105 ms
home.jpg
400 ms
antivirus.jpg
295 ms
hero-1.jpg
806 ms
design.jpg
804 ms
AdrianT.jpg
175 ms
Christian.jpg
185 ms
thorstenwehner.jpg
263 ms
Chris-Utah-2.jpg
263 ms
Jane1.jpg
341 ms
Hariata-Cairns.jpg
345 ms
facebook.png
373 ms
twitter.png
427 ms
google-plus.png
427 ms
speed.png
165 ms
scalability.png
166 ms
security.png
172 ms
wold.png
182 ms
domains.png
179 ms
support.png
180 ms
separator.png
436 ms
featured2.jpg
1048 ms
hassle.jpg
379 ms
font-awesome.min.css
452 ms
IczWvq5y_Cwwv_rBjOtT0w.woff
55 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
55 ms
8KhZd3VQBtXTAznvKjw-kxsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
55 ms
RJMlAoFXXQEzZoMSUteGWD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
55 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12bxsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
54 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIxsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
55 ms
1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
54 ms
PKCRbVvRfd5n7BTjtGiFZBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
55 ms
sofiaprobold-webfont-alt.woff
761 ms
sofiaproregular-webfont-alt.woff
759 ms
collect
15 ms
sofiaprolight-webfont-alt.woff
700 ms
skin.css
131 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
261 ms
ribb.png
86 ms
ribb-inverse.png
94 ms
blank.gif
102 ms
skin.png
115 ms
maintenancer.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
maintenancer.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
maintenancer.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Maintenancer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Maintenancer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
maintenancer.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Maintenancer. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: