Tools & Wizards About Us
makersite.io screenshot

Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

makersite.io

One moment, please...

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

49 ms

Resources Loaded

483 ms

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

makersite.io screenshot

About Website

Welcome to makersite.io homepage info - get ready to check Makersite best content right away, or after learning these important things about makersite.io

AI, data and apps for procurement, product design and expert teams to make faster sustainable product and supply chain decisions, at scale.

Visit makersite.io

Key Findings

We analyzed Makersite.io page load time and found that the first response time was 49 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

makersite.io performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

92/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

67/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.049

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.2 s

74/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

makersite.io

49 ms

makersite.io

250 ms

style.min.css

26 ms

style.css

24 ms

theme-styles.css

21 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Makersite.io and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (250 ms) belongs to the original domain Makersite.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 423.2 kB (12%)

Content Size

3.7 MB

After Optimization

3.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Makersite.io main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 188.6 kB

  • Original 218.6 kB
  • After minification 208.5 kB
  • After compression 29.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 188.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 234.5 kB

  • Original 3.4 MB
  • After minification 3.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Makersite images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (64%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Makersite. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

makersite.io

makersite.io

49 ms

makersite.io

makersite.io

250 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

26 ms

style.css

style.css

24 ms

theme-styles.css

theme-styles.css

21 ms

splide.min.css

splide.min.css

29 ms

theme-options.css

theme-options.css

29 ms

include-fonts.css

include-fonts.css

19 ms

aos.css

aos.css

30 ms

borlabs-cookie_1_en.css

borlabs-cookie_1_en.css

32 ms

stage.css

stage.css

20 ms

tabs.css

tabs.css

61 ms

clients.css

clients.css

65 ms

iframe.css

iframe.css

63 ms

text-block.css

text-block.css

62 ms

tabs.css

tabs.css

63 ms

banner.css

banner.css

66 ms

cards.css

cards.css

65 ms

blog-teaser.css

blog-teaser.css

66 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

79 ms

CaretRight.svg

CaretRight.svg

73 ms

Forrester-Makersite-1.png

Forrester-Makersite-1.png

77 ms

borlabs-cookie-icon-dynamic.svg

borlabs-cookie-icon-dynamic.svg

73 ms

221017_Makersite_Route_final_Stage02.jpg

221017_Makersite_Route_final_Stage02.jpg

60 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

20 ms

Microsoft_logo_2012.svg

Microsoft_logo_2012.svg

21 ms

221123_Makersite_Stages_Landingpage.jpg

221123_Makersite_Stages_Landingpage.jpg

35 ms

ArboriaBook.woff

ArboriaBook.woff

27 ms

ArboriaBold.woff

ArboriaBold.woff

14 ms

ArboriaMedium.woff

ArboriaMedium.woff

26 ms

Accessibility Review

makersite.io accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

makersite.io best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

makersite.io SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Makersite.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Makersite.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

makersite.io

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Makersite. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: