Tools & Wizards About Us
manualversusautomatic.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

manualversusautomatic.com

Manual vs. automatic transmission

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

329 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

413 ms

manualversusautomatic.com screenshot

About Website

Visit manualversusautomatic.com now to see the best up-to-date Manual Versus Automatic content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about manualversusautomatic.com

Comparison between manual versus automatic transmission cars

Visit manualversusautomatic.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Manualversusautomatic.com page load time and found that the first response time was 329 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

manualversusautomatic.com performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

96/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

62/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,830 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.352

31/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.8 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

manualversusautomatic.com

329 ms

styles.css

70 ms

show_ads.js

5 ms

urchin.js

43 ms

logo.jpg

263 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 12% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Manualversusautomatic.com, 12% (6 requests) were made to C.betrad.com and 12% (6 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (411 ms) relates to the external source C.betrad.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 105.9 kB (34%)

Content Size

310.1 kB

After Optimization

204.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Manualversusautomatic.com main page is 310.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 167.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 6.9 kB

  • Original 10.3 kB
  • After minification 9.9 kB
  • After compression 3.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.9 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 20.8 kB

  • Original 125.3 kB
  • After minification 104.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Manual Versus Automatic needs image optimization as it can save up to 20.8 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-44%

Potential reduce by 73.1 kB

  • Original 167.8 kB
  • After minification 167.6 kB
  • After compression 94.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 73.1 kB or 44% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 5.1 kB

  • Original 6.7 kB
  • After minification 5.9 kB
  • After compression 1.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Manualversusautomatic.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.1 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (64%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Manual Versus Automatic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

manualversusautomatic.com

manualversusautomatic.com

329 ms

styles.css

styles.css

70 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

5 ms

urchin.js

urchin.js

43 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

263 ms

nav_img.jpg

nav_img.jpg

265 ms

ca-pub-7904393329265613.js

ca-pub-7904393329265613.js

94 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

202 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

74 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

31 ms

bbg.png

bbg.png

113 ms

manual-transmission.jpg

manual-transmission.jpg

268 ms

ads

ads

207 ms

osd.js

osd.js

46 ms

ads

ads

213 ms

ads

ads

204 ms

css

css

83 ms

m_js_controller.js

m_js_controller.js

44 ms

abg.js

abg.js

57 ms

aclk

aclk

145 ms

skeleton.js

skeleton.js

179 ms

favicon

favicon

165 ms

nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png

nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png

110 ms

s

s

92 ms

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

204 ms

favicon

favicon

158 ms

x_button_blue2.png

x_button_blue2.png

55 ms

1-16_PMCIT_0_300x250_DST_t1-build-and-price-ram-promaster-city-transition_EN_Huge_V1.jpg

1-16_PMCIT_0_300x250_DST_t1-build-and-price-ram-promaster-city-transition_EN_Huge_V1.jpg

205 ms

lidar.js

lidar.js

41 ms

antenna2.js

antenna2.js

379 ms

surly.js

surly.js

411 ms

rs.js

rs.js

386 ms

sbhK2lTE.js

sbhK2lTE.js

61 ms

cTrvNaRi.html

cTrvNaRi.html

119 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

313 ms

veBs87dwiCXgZb9CwomBYiW1hyWXgp0ohA3Vj3gnbUg.js

veBs87dwiCXgZb9CwomBYiW1hyWXgp0ohA3Vj3gnbUg.js

46 ms

ba.html

ba.html

124 ms

4.gif

4.gif

178 ms

rpc.flow

rpc.flow

171 ms

vce_st.js

vce_st.js

155 ms

m

m

91 ms

16062.js

16062.js

74 ms

dt

dt

143 ms

p2

p2

33 ms

skeleton.js

skeleton.js

118 ms

p

p

47 ms

p

p

34 ms

box_19_top-right.png

box_19_top-right.png

27 ms

ci.png

ci.png

37 ms

ui

ui

51 ms

Accessibility Review

manualversusautomatic.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

manualversusautomatic.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

manualversusautomatic.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Manualversusautomatic.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Manualversusautomatic.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

manualversusautomatic.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Manual Versus Automatic. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: