8.4 sec in total
1.9 sec
6.2 sec
347 ms
Click here to check amazing Marine Urea content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about marineurea.com
We have supplied Marine Urea to Offshore Rigs as well as variety of Exploration Vessels to Oil & Gas Cargo Carriers such as VLCC. Container Liners.
Visit marineurea.comWe analyzed Marineurea.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
marineurea.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
52/100
10%
Value3.4 s
66/100
25%
Value6.2 s
43/100
10%
Value50 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value4.6 s
81/100
10%
1859 ms
832 ms
22 ms
794 ms
860 ms
Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Marineurea.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Static.cloudflareinsights.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Marineurea.com.
Page size can be reduced by 96.8 kB (14%)
678.4 kB
581.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Marineurea.com main page is 678.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 418.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 88.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Marine Urea images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 113 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 559 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Marineurea.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (79%)
34
7
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Marine Urea. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
marineurea.com
1859 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
832 ms
style.min.css
22 ms
classic-themes.min.css
794 ms
global.min.css
860 ms
header.min.css
22 ms
content.min.css
826 ms
footer.min.css
20 ms
menu-addon.css
884 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
34 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
47 ms
swiper.min.css
59 ms
post-8.css
68 ms
post-19.css
895 ms
fluent-forms-elementor-widget.css
1335 ms
general.min.css
573 ms
fontawesome.min.css
585 ms
solid.min.css
596 ms
jquery.min.js
1627 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
606 ms
1f8912b7156cb47d88821e634cd5cde7.css
1446 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
1122 ms
navigation.min.js
1699 ms
general.min.js
903 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1734 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
2221 ms
waypoints.min.js
2176 ms
core.min.js
2280 ms
frontend.min.js
2665 ms
v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317
62 ms
SeaCrestor-AUS40-logo-white-border-small.png
1159 ms
Marine-Urea-Container-Ship-front-page.jpg
1988 ms
Marine-Urea-Offshore-Rig-Vessel-feature.jpg
1972 ms
Marine-Urea-Container-Vessel-feature.jpg
1653 ms
Marine-Urea-Cruise-Ferry-feature.jpg
1764 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
2659 ms
marineurea.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
marineurea.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
marineurea.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Marineurea.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Marineurea.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
marineurea.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Marine Urea. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: