59.1 sec in total
1.9 sec
32.5 sec
24.7 sec
Visit matchhighlight.com now to see the best up-to-date Matchhighlight content for Japan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about matchhighlight.com
Visit matchhighlight.comWe analyzed Matchhighlight.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 57.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
matchhighlight.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
58/100
10%
Value3.7 s
58/100
25%
Value3.1 s
93/100
10%
Value140 ms
95/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.1 s
52/100
10%
1910 ms
495 ms
440 ms
1086 ms
570 ms
Our browser made a total of 125 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (103 requests) were addressed to the original Matchhighlight.com, 3% (4 requests) were made to Imgg-cdn.mgid.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Staticxx.facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.2 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.mgid.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (17%)
9.1 MB
7.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Matchhighlight.com main page is 9.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 7.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 164.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 36.2 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 164.8 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 378.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Matchhighlight images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 534.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 534.6 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 447.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Matchhighlight.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 447.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (24%)
121
92
The browser has sent 121 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Matchhighlight. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.matchhighlight.com
1910 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
495 ms
styles.css
440 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1086 ms
font-awesome.min.css
570 ms
style.css
674 ms
responsive.css
550 ms
custom.php
1249 ms
owl.carousel.css
733 ms
addtoany.min.css
963 ms
jquery.js
1310 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1223 ms
dashicons.min.css
2712 ms
thickbox.css
1159 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1158 ms
scripts.js
3155 ms
bootstrap.min.js
3363 ms
tinynav.min.js
3310 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
3308 ms
theme-script.js
3543 ms
wp-embed.min.js
3542 ms
thickbox.js
3568 ms
Match-Highlight-Logoes.png
1593 ms
locker-room-200x150.png
1609 ms
World-Cup-2018-Qualifiers-Highlights-1-200x150.jpg
1530 ms
football-on5-200x150.jpg
1493 ms
hqdefault.jpg
1533 ms
718052efd4fc8e037b4b9135c87f1f9967d54c43-200x150.jpg
1524 ms
World-Cup-2018-Qualifiers-Highlights-200x150.jpg
1555 ms
the-xtra-200x150.png
1585 ms
total-italian-football-200x150.png
1587 ms
Bundesliga-Special-%E2%80%93-Best-Of-August-200x150.png
1584 ms
ESPN-FC-Soccer-News-Show-200x150.png
1644 ms
premier-league-world-200x150.png
1669 ms
Udinese-vs.-Torino-200x150.png
1582 ms
Cagliari-vs.-Palermo-200x150.png
1901 ms
Benfica-vs.-Pacos-Ferreira-200x150.jpg
1614 ms
Toulouse-FC-v.-Olympique-Lyonnais-200x150.png
1871 ms
Juventus-v.-SSC-Napoli-200x150.png
2145 ms
Lazio-vs.-Sassuolo-1-200x150.jpg
1751 ms
Arouca-vs.-Maritimo-200x150.jpg
1751 ms
Stade-Rennes-vs.-FC-Metz-200x150.jpg
1750 ms
Deportivo-La-Coruna-vs.-Valencia-200x150.jpg
1892 ms
Cameroon-vs.-Nigeria-200x150.jpg
1896 ms
Republic-of-Ireland-vs.-Belarus-200x150.jpg
1874 ms
France-vs.-Cameroon-200x150.jpg
2076 ms
New-York-City-vs.-Orlando-City-200x150.jpg
2076 ms
Panama-vs.-Brasil-200x150.jpg
1870 ms
Italy-vs.-Scotland-200x150.jpg
1900 ms
Portugal-vs.-Norway-200x150.jpg
1981 ms
Romania-vs.-Ukraine-200x150.jpg
1315 ms
Turkey-vs.-Montenegro-200x150.jpg
1238 ms
Portsmouth-vs.-Rotherham-United-200x150.jpg
1291 ms
Montreal-Impact-vs.-Chicago-Fire-200x150.jpg
1176 ms
CSKA-Moscow-vs.-Young-Boys-200x150.jpg
1058 ms
Puebla-vs.-Club-Leon-200x150.jpg
1057 ms
FC-Dallas-vs.-New-York-Red-Bulls-200x150.jpg
1066 ms
Canada-vs.-Jamaica-200x150.jpg
1065 ms
Manchester-United-Legends-vs.-Barcelona-Legends-200x150.jpg
1062 ms
Mexico-v.-Canada-1-200x150.png
1355 ms
Paraguay-v.-Brazil-1-200x150.png
1077 ms
Switzerland-vs.-Bosnia-1-200x150.jpg
1016 ms
Germany-vs-Italy-1-200x150.png
1541 ms
England-vs-Netherlands-200x150.jpg
988 ms
Liverpool-vs.-Arsenal-200x150.jpg
1015 ms
Everton-vs.-Bournemouth-200x150.png
1510 ms
West-Bromwich-Albion-FC-v.-West-Ham-United-200x150.png
1477 ms
Stoke-City-vs.-Sunderland-200x150.png
1509 ms
Manchester-United-vs.-Leicester-City-200x150.jpg
1198 ms
Atl%C3%A9tico-Madrid-vs-Rayo-Vallecano-200x150.png
1450 ms
Huddersfield-Town-vs.-Southampton-200x150.jpg
1425 ms
Crystal-Palace-vs.-Swansea-City-200x150.jpg
1312 ms
Borussia-Dortmund-vs.-Vfl-Wolfsburg-200x150.jpg
1312 ms
Maritimo-vs.-Boavista-200x150.jpg
1312 ms
Manchester-City-vs-Everton-200x150.jpg
1496 ms
Tottenham-Hotspur-vs.-Chelsea-200x150.jpg
1497 ms
Deportivo-Alav%C3%A9s-vs.-Barcelona-200x150.jpg
1476 ms
Las-Palmas-vs-Atletico-Madrid-200x150.jpg
1476 ms
Girona-vs.-Malaga-200x150.jpg
1473 ms
Levante-vs.-Deportivo-La-Coruna-200x150.jpg
1273 ms
Real-Sociedad-vs.-Villarreal-200x150.jpg
1273 ms
Real-Betis-vs.-Celta-Vigo-200x150.jpg
1272 ms
Malaga-vs.-Eibar-200x150.jpg
1241 ms
Levante-vs.-Villarreal-200x150.jpg
1240 ms
Deportivo-La-Coruna-vs.-Real-Madrid-200x150.jpg
2909 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
2909 ms
supermarket-webfont.woff
2814 ms
Barcelona-vs.-Real-Betis-200x150.jpg
2805 ms
Athletic-Bilbao-vs.-Getafe-200x150.jpg
2751 ms
Pittsburgh-Steelers-vs-New-York-Giants-200x150.png
2822 ms
Jacksonville-Jaguars-vs-New-England-Patriots-200x150.jpg
2750 ms
Houston-Texans-vs-Carolina-Panthers-200x150.jpg
2761 ms
Arizona-Cardinals-vs-Dallas-Cowboys-200x150.jpg
2762 ms
no-image-landscape.png
2728 ms
slaton-200x150.png
2751 ms
Swansea-City-vs-Manchester-United-200x150.jpg
2747 ms
Manchester-United-vs.-West-Ham-United-200x150.jpg
2691 ms
Liverpool-vs.-TSG-Hoffenheim-200x150.jpg
2452 ms
Liverpool-vs-Crystal-Palace-200x150.jpg
2451 ms
Hoffenheim-vs-Liverpool-200x150.jpg
2496 ms
Watford-vs.-Liverpool-200x150.jpg
2277 ms
matchhighlight.com.96462.js
1886 ms
sdk.js
209 ms
1
2184 ms
js15.js
3376 ms
3439 ms
mgid_logo_mini_43x20.png
4201 ms
2123877_492x328.jpg
4200 ms
i.js
3156 ms
beacon.js
206 ms
2383091_492x328.jpg
1254 ms
2149738_492x328.jpg
1207 ms
2033519_492x328.jpg
1208 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1399 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
438 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
1749 ms
2176565.php
1193 ms
analytics.js
54 ms
page.js
2293 ms
c
1076 ms
cc_432.js
2229 ms
2172 ms
collect
374 ms
tpid=h853mHuf12L9
3834 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
1572 ms
matchhighlight.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
matchhighlight.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
matchhighlight.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Matchhighlight.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Matchhighlight.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
matchhighlight.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Matchhighlight. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: