Tools & Wizards About Us
materialsproject.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 68

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

materialsproject.org

Materials Project

Page Load Speed

593 ms in total

First Response

48 ms

Resources Loaded

482 ms

Page Rendered

63 ms

materialsproject.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to materialsproject.org homepage info - get ready to check Materials Project best content for China right away, or after learning these important things about materialsproject.org

The Materials Project's mission is to accelerate the the discovery of new technological materials through advanced scientific computing and innovative design tools.

Visit materialsproject.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Materialsproject.org page load time and found that the first response time was 48 ms and then it took 545 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

materialsproject.org performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value29.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value16.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value8,000 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value38.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

materialsproject.org

48 ms

next-gen.materialsproject.org

68 ms

bulma.min.css

52 ms

all.min.css

74 ms

main.bbdd8fe5995599bb25af.css

36 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Materialsproject.org, 65% (15 requests) were made to Unpkg.com and 17% (4 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (298 ms) relates to the external source Unpkg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 433.5 kB (26%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Materialsproject.org main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 47.9 kB

  • Original 55.7 kB
  • After minification 55.5 kB
  • After compression 7.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 13.5 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Materials Project images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 209.3 kB

  • Original 298.4 kB
  • After minification 239.5 kB
  • After compression 89.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 209.3 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 162.8 kB

  • Original 198.6 kB
  • After minification 194.0 kB
  • After compression 35.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Materialsproject.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 162.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (81%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

4

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Materials Project. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

materialsproject.org

materialsproject.org

48 ms

next-gen.materialsproject.org

next-gen.materialsproject.org

68 ms

bulma.min.css

bulma.min.css

52 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

74 ms

main.bbdd8fe5995599bb25af.css

main.bbdd8fe5995599bb25af.css

36 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

31 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

61 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

111 ms

prop-types.min.js

prop-types.min.js

110 ms

MathJax.js

MathJax.js

110 ms

dash_mp_components.min.js

dash_mp_components.min.js

298 ms

dash_ag_grid.min.js

dash_ag_grid.min.js

110 ms

dash_iconify.min.js

dash_iconify.min.js

110 ms

dash_mantine_components.js

dash_mantine_components.js

134 ms

bundle.js

bundle.js

131 ms

bundle.js

bundle.js

132 ms

dashAgGridComponentFunctions.js

dashAgGridComponentFunctions.js

60 ms

dash_renderer.min.js

dash_renderer.min.js

131 ms

dash_core_components.js

dash_core_components.js

136 ms

dash_core_components-shared.js

dash_core_components-shared.js

133 ms

dash_html_components.min.js

dash_html_components.min.js

134 ms

bundle.js

bundle.js

134 ms

TeX-MML-AM_CHTML.js

TeX-MML-AM_CHTML.js

22 ms

Accessibility Review

materialsproject.org accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

materialsproject.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

materialsproject.org SEO score

68

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Materialsproject.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Materialsproject.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

materialsproject.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: