813 ms in total
70 ms
596 ms
147 ms
Visit mazeez.dev now to see the best up-to-date M Azeez content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mazeez.dev
A blog about software engineering and beyond!
Visit mazeez.devWe analyzed Mazeez.dev page load time and found that the first response time was 70 ms and then it took 743 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
mazeez.dev performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
62/100
10%
Value7.0 s
6/100
25%
Value3.5 s
88/100
10%
Value730 ms
41/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.1 s
33/100
10%
70 ms
160 ms
26 ms
31 ms
48 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Mazeez.dev, 28% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (175 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 34.2 kB (4%)
771.0 kB
736.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Mazeez.dev main page is 771.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 512.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.6 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.4 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. M Azeez images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 86 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (85%)
20
3
The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of M Azeez. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
mazeez.dev
70 ms
mazeez.dev
160 ms
bootstrap.min.css
26 ms
highlight.css
31 ms
clean-blog.css
48 ms
master.css
50 ms
font-awesome.min.css
66 ms
css
38 ms
css
56 ms
override.css
63 ms
jquery.min.js
68 ms
bootstrap.min.js
61 ms
highlight.pack.js
80 ms
clean-blog.js
85 ms
d3.v3.min.js
100 ms
trianglify.min.js
85 ms
Please-compressed.js
86 ms
background-check.min.js
88 ms
js
78 ms
adsbygoogle.js
53 ms
cover.jpg
63 ms
0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787weuxJBkqg.ttf
62 ms
0QI6MX1D_JOuGQbT0gvTJPa787z5vBJBkqg.ttf
121 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
127 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
129 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
130 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
175 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
130 ms
0QI8MX1D_JOuMw_hLdO6T2wV9KnW-MoFoq92mQ.ttf
130 ms
0QI8MX1D_JOuMw_hLdO6T2wV9KnW-C0Coq92mQ.ttf
175 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
58 ms
show_ads_impl.js
78 ms
mazeez.dev accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
mazeez.dev best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
mazeez.dev SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mazeez.dev can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mazeez.dev main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mazeez.dev
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of M Azeez. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: