Tools & Wizards About Us
medcom.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 87% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    67% of websites

medcom.com

International Medcom, Inc. | Radiation Detection for a Healthy Planet

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

224 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

medcom.com screenshot

About Website

Visit medcom.com now to see the best up-to-date Medcom content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about medcom.com

Radiation detection instruments and systems, geiger counters, radiation safety programs, radiation education, community radiation monitoring

Visit medcom.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Medcom.com page load time and found that the first response time was 224 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

medcom.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.2 s

20/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value500 ms

58/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.344

32/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.3 s

24/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

medcom.com

224 ms

medcom.com

290 ms

autoptimize_390d10259e3aa0a4f8853b249e756dd0.css

164 ms

jquery.min.js

38 ms

autoptimize_single_4b8e19f3dc3a22572352e6abc41762b3.js

336 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Medcom.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Adtrack.voicestar.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (767 ms) belongs to the original domain Medcom.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 44.6 kB (2%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Medcom.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 36.7 kB

  • Original 44.5 kB
  • After minification 36.2 kB
  • After compression 7.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.3 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Medcom images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 70.3 kB
  • After minification 70.3 kB
  • After compression 67.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 485 B

  • Original 62.5 kB
  • After minification 62.5 kB
  • After compression 62.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Medcom.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (18%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

45

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Medcom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

medcom.com

medcom.com

224 ms

medcom.com

medcom.com

290 ms

autoptimize_390d10259e3aa0a4f8853b249e756dd0.css

autoptimize_390d10259e3aa0a4f8853b249e756dd0.css

164 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

38 ms

autoptimize_single_4b8e19f3dc3a22572352e6abc41762b3.js

autoptimize_single_4b8e19f3dc3a22572352e6abc41762b3.js

336 ms

bundle.js

bundle.js

102 ms

number-changer.js

number-changer.js

104 ms

autoptimize_56411293496589c2426d2613ea34dcfb.js

autoptimize_56411293496589c2426d2613ea34dcfb.js

531 ms

css

css

125 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

174 ms

international-medcom-194715.png

international-medcom-194715.png

274 ms

IMI-logo.png

IMI-logo.png

219 ms

red_icon_v2f.png

red_icon_v2f.png

210 ms

blue_icon_v2f.png

blue_icon_v2f.png

212 ms

green_icon_v2f.png

green_icon_v2f.png

194 ms

icon_v2ff.png

icon_v2ff.png

230 ms

orange_icon_v2f.png

orange_icon_v2f.png

232 ms

IA-cutout-angle-view-new-IA-logo1.png

IA-cutout-angle-view-new-IA-logo1.png

584 ms

insector-ble.png

insector-ble.png

238 ms

Radalert-100_icon.png

Radalert-100_icon.png

286 ms

Rad100_ubermenu.jpg

Rad100_ubermenu.jpg

290 ms

ONYX_ubermenu.png

ONYX_ubermenu.png

413 ms

Hawk-Radius_megamenu.png

Hawk-Radius_megamenu.png

355 ms

Hawk_EMS_megamenu.png

Hawk_EMS_megamenu.png

355 ms

Food-Inspector.png

Food-Inspector.png

426 ms

slide_medical-2.jpg

slide_medical-2.jpg

525 ms

home-page-slideshow_inspector-BLE-2.jpg

home-page-slideshow_inspector-BLE-2.jpg

471 ms

home-page-slideshow_food-lab.jpg

home-page-slideshow_food-lab.jpg

526 ms

Geiger-link-2.jpg

Geiger-link-2.jpg

543 ms

slideshow_2-ia-new.jpg

slideshow_2-ia-new.jpg

597 ms

slideshow_KB.jpg

slideshow_KB.jpg

589 ms

slideshow_hawk_ems.jpg

slideshow_hawk_ems.jpg

638 ms

slideshow_bGeigie.jpg

slideshow_bGeigie.jpg

767 ms

comparison_chart.png

comparison_chart.png

601 ms

radiation_logo.png

radiation_logo.png

635 ms

ONYX_slider_1.jpg

ONYX_slider_1.jpg

643 ms

ONYX_slider_2.jpg

ONYX_slider_2.jpg

656 ms

wsj.jpg

wsj.jpg

660 ms

nyt.jpg

nyt.jpg

693 ms

pbs.jpg

pbs.jpg

696 ms

nhk.jpg

nhk.jpg

698 ms

nbc.jpg

nbc.jpg

727 ms

abc.jpg

abc.jpg

719 ms

cbs.jpg

cbs.jpg

761 ms

cnn.jpg

cnn.jpg

762 ms

international-medcom-194715.js

international-medcom-194715.js

175 ms

cnet.jpg

cnet.jpg

658 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

736 ms

collect

collect

39 ms

wired-logo.jpg

wired-logo.jpg

598 ms

yahoo.jpg

yahoo.jpg

639 ms

gizmodo-logo.jpg

gizmodo-logo.jpg

622 ms

protect-badge-2.png

protect-badge-2.png

631 ms

getnumdata.js

getnumdata.js

30 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

103 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

83 ms

autoptimize_dcb2de333eec7ab4ae31385ed8d6a393.css

autoptimize_dcb2de333eec7ab4ae31385ed8d6a393.css

66 ms

legacy.min.css

legacy.min.css

149 ms

Accessibility Review

medcom.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

medcom.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

medcom.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Medcom.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Medcom.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

medcom.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Medcom. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: