Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

mediafane.com

玉祥开户-首页

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

728 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

567 ms

mediafane.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to mediafane.com homepage info - get ready to check Mediafane best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about mediafane.com

玉祥开户【易记:bobet195.com】,本站建立于2003年,▲玉祥开户平台▲游戏丰富多彩,重金打造品质娱乐平台玉祥开户官网,▲登录即送【豪礼100-38】是一款好评如潮的玉祥开户在线,平台中每日都有数以万计的玩家同时在线,非常的火爆!

Visit mediafane.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mediafane.com page load time and found that the first response time was 728 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Mediafane.com rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

mediafane.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

www.mediafane.com

728 ms

style.css

228 ms

styles.css

153 ms

mp.css

166 ms

jquery.min.js

15 ms

Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Mediafane.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to Adx.adosx.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (818 ms) belongs to the original domain Mediafane.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 531.0 kB (41%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

762.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Mediafane.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 662.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 72.8 kB

  • Original 87.0 kB
  • After minification 83.2 kB
  • After compression 14.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 76.2 kB

  • Original 662.3 kB
  • After minification 586.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Mediafane needs image optimization as it can save up to 76.2 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 148.4 kB

  • Original 261.6 kB
  • After minification 261.4 kB
  • After compression 113.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 148.4 kB or 57% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 233.5 kB

  • Original 282.1 kB
  • After minification 273.3 kB
  • After compression 48.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mediafane.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 233.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (48%)

Requests Now

81

After Optimization

42

The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mediafane. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

mediafane.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mediafane.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Mediafane.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mediafane. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: