Tools & Wizards About Us
mediasurgery.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 85

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

mediasurgery.co.uk

Experienced Web Design Aberdeen - Company - Scotland. | Media Surgery

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

258 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

424 ms

mediasurgery.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Media Surgery content for Pakistan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mediasurgery.co.uk

With over 20 years in building websites we maximise each site for success. Based in Aberdeen City Centre. Specialising in Craft CMS builds.

Visit mediasurgery.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Mediasurgery.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 258 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mediasurgery.co.uk performance score

85

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

62/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

62/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.7 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.067

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.2 s

95/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mediasurgery.co.uk

258 ms

www.mediasurgery.co.uk

859 ms

7b061a3e7a6e7d82b3a0b299195629edca056342.1456419399.css

170 ms

respond.min.js

178 ms

jquery.min.js

7 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Mediasurgery.co.uk, 13% (6 requests) were made to and 6% (3 requests) were made to Use.typekit.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (859 ms) belongs to the original domain Mediasurgery.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 397.6 kB (42%)

Content Size

958.1 kB

After Optimization

560.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mediasurgery.co.uk main page is 958.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 327.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 108.6 kB

  • Original 284.3 kB
  • After minification 280.9 kB
  • After compression 175.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 108.6 kB or 38% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 19.7 kB

  • Original 286.6 kB
  • After minification 267.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Media Surgery images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 222.2 kB

  • Original 327.5 kB
  • After minification 323.1 kB
  • After compression 105.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 222.2 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 47.2 kB

  • Original 59.6 kB
  • After minification 58.1 kB
  • After compression 12.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mediasurgery.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 47.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (36%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Media Surgery. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

mediasurgery.co.uk

mediasurgery.co.uk

258 ms

www.mediasurgery.co.uk

www.mediasurgery.co.uk

859 ms

7b061a3e7a6e7d82b3a0b299195629edca056342.1456419399.css

7b061a3e7a6e7d82b3a0b299195629edca056342.1456419399.css

170 ms

respond.min.js

respond.min.js

178 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

7 ms

29ea2f85d49ae56391932bbacf3cf1a803f1ceb9.1455631766.js

29ea2f85d49ae56391932bbacf3cf1a803f1ceb9.1455631766.js

208 ms

acb8bjp.js

acb8bjp.js

206 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

92 ms

logo-2012.png

logo-2012.png

164 ms

nav-stripes.png

nav-stripes.png

164 ms

ashfield.jpg

ashfield.jpg

167 ms

hom.jpg

hom.jpg

262 ms

wp.jpg

wp.jpg

259 ms

cc.jpg

cc.jpg

369 ms

first.jpg

first.jpg

429 ms

bg-boxes.png

bg-boxes.png

369 ms

20-channel-Poster_200_113_imagesplay.png_0_0_90_r_b_0_0_c1.jpg

20-channel-Poster_200_113_imagesplay.png_0_0_90_r_b_0_0_c1.jpg

371 ms

019-ee-Poster_200_113_imagesplay.png_0_0_90_r_b_0_0_c1.jpg

019-ee-Poster_200_113_imagesplay.png_0_0_90_r_b_0_0_c1.jpg

530 ms

018-Poster_200_113_imagesplay.png_0_0_90_r_b_0_0_c1.jpg

018-Poster_200_113_imagesplay.png_0_0_90_r_b_0_0_c1.jpg

531 ms

005-craft-poster-full_200_113_imagesplay.png_0_0_90_r_b_0_0_c1.jpg

005-craft-poster-full_200_113_imagesplay.png_0_0_90_r_b_0_0_c1.jpg

581 ms

004-poster_200_113_imagesplay.png_0_0_90_r_b_0_0_c1.jpg

004-poster_200_113_imagesplay.png_0_0_90_r_b_0_0_c1.jpg

529 ms

003-poster-404s_200_113_imagesplay.png_0_0_90_r_b_0_0_c1.jpg

003-poster-404s_200_113_imagesplay.png_0_0_90_r_b_0_0_c1.jpg

637 ms

sprites.png

sprites.png

594 ms

7b061a3e7a6e7d82b3a0b299195629edca056342.1456419399.css

7b061a3e7a6e7d82b3a0b299195629edca056342.1456419399.css

588 ms

d

d

201 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

73 ms

woopra.js

woopra.js

73 ms

piwik.js

piwik.js

436 ms

hotjar-92379.js

hotjar-92379.js

177 ms

big.css

big.css

333 ms

d

d

113 ms

big.css

big.css

387 ms

bg_control_nav.png

bg_control_nav.png

413 ms

arrows.png

arrows.png

438 ms

collect

collect

25 ms

sprites.png

sprites.png

514 ms

AU5JcE0A

AU5JcE0A

16 ms

dvb8P7u+DBu+DfwCiK0NEAA==

dvb8P7u+DBu+DfwCiK0NEAA==

15 ms

wQ3aHlGAAAA

wQ3aHlGAAAA

14 ms

cRXDnFWDAMsdzmJlR0NJp4h1fRqHjXlv0T8nsEylovrV7KK1axhLetYzwY2sonNZLKFLLLJYau1re3sYCe57BI37WEv+8RdBzjIIQ5zRFyfz1GOcZwTnOQUpznDWc5RwHkuWJsu5BJFFFPCZa78BIyWt2YAAA==

cRXDnFWDAMsdzmJlR0NJp4h1fRqHjXlv0T8nsEylovrV7KK1axhLetYzwY2sonNZLKFLLLJYau1re3sYCe57BI37WEv+8RdBzjIIQ5zRFyfz1GOcZwTnOQUpznDWc5RwHkuWJsu5BJFFFPCZa78BIyWt2YAAA==

13 ms

d7d6H1Tvgyrvg18BGkdwAA==

d7d6H1Tvgyrvg18BGkdwAA==

14 ms

gWenamAAA==

gWenamAAA==

12 ms

123 ms

p.gif

p.gif

125 ms

modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js

modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js

26 ms

screen.png

screen.png

175 ms

visit-data

visit-data

222 ms

Accessibility Review

mediasurgery.co.uk accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

mediasurgery.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

mediasurgery.co.uk SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mediasurgery.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mediasurgery.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

mediasurgery.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Media Surgery. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: