Tools & Wizards About Us
mediatel.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

mediatel.com

International Premium Numbers | Premium Mobile Numbers | Premium Rate Numbers

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

172 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

799 ms

mediatel.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to mediatel.com homepage info - get ready to check Mediatel best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about mediatel.com

Contact Mediatel to get started today and start making money with international premium numbers.

Visit mediatel.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Mediatel.com page load time and found that the first response time was 172 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mediatel.com performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.2 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value340 ms

74/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.138

79/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.2 s

41/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mediatel.com

172 ms

www.mediatel.com

341 ms

js

74 ms

gtm.js

111 ms

template.css

160 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Mediatel.com, 17% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (750 ms) belongs to the original domain Mediatel.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 85.1 kB (5%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mediatel.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 58.7 kB

  • Original 69.6 kB
  • After minification 56.0 kB
  • After compression 10.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.6 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 9.7 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mediatel images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 8.7 kB

  • Original 118.5 kB
  • After minification 118.5 kB
  • After compression 109.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 8.1 kB

  • Original 78.6 kB
  • After minification 78.6 kB
  • After compression 70.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mediatel.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (67%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mediatel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

mediatel.com

mediatel.com

172 ms

www.mediatel.com

www.mediatel.com

341 ms

js

js

74 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

111 ms

template.css

template.css

160 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

234 ms

material-icons.css

material-icons.css

235 ms

material-design.css

material-design.css

231 ms

color_scheme_1.css

color_scheme_1.css

229 ms

owl-carousel.css

owl-carousel.css

232 ms

rd-parallax.css

rd-parallax.css

236 ms

swiper.css

swiper.css

304 ms

animate.css

animate.css

304 ms

navbar.css

navbar.css

302 ms

css

css

36 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

383 ms

jquery-noconflict.js

jquery-noconflict.js

309 ms

jquery-migrate.js

jquery-migrate.js

310 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

380 ms

chosen.js

chosen.js

378 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

377 ms

slogin.js

slogin.js

378 ms

jquery_003.js

jquery_003.js

402 ms

jquery_002.js

jquery_002.js

451 ms

counters.js

counters.js

452 ms

swiper.js

swiper.js

531 ms

menu.js

menu.js

454 ms

jquery_004.js

jquery_004.js

454 ms

swiper_all.js

swiper_all.js

462 ms

cookieconsent.min.css

cookieconsent.min.css

31 ms

cookieconsent.min.js

cookieconsent.min.js

39 ms

zenscroll-min.js

zenscroll-min.js

523 ms

logo.png

logo.png

76 ms

30years.png

30years.png

79 ms

logo_white.png

logo_white.png

78 ms

Hello.jpg

Hello.jpg

388 ms

triangle.png

triangle.png

82 ms

logo_small.png

logo_small.png

82 ms

we.jpg

we.jpg

222 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aXw.woff

16 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff

34 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aXw.woff

40 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aXw.woff

41 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aXw.woff

42 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aXw.woff

41 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff

40 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aXw.woff

40 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aXw.woff

62 ms

slide-1.jpg

slide-1.jpg

311 ms

who.jpg

who.jpg

226 ms

what.jpg

what.jpg

302 ms

how.jpg

how.jpg

92 ms

why.jpg

why.jpg

750 ms

Accessibility Review

mediatel.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

mediatel.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

mediatel.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mediatel.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mediatel.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

mediatel.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mediatel. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: