Report Summary

  • 78

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 49

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

medirama.net

九游官网网页版_九游会官方网站登录

Page Load Speed

5.5 sec in total

First Response

28 ms

Resources Loaded

5.1 sec

Page Rendered

448 ms

medirama.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to medirama.net homepage info - get ready to check Medirama best content right away, or after learning these important things about medirama.net

【九游会】游戏官网更加安全可靠有保障,j9九游会是专业可信赖的平台。九游会官方网站指定九游会方备用线,九游在线网站真诚期待您的到来。九游会登录更加快速

Visit medirama.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Medirama.net page load time and found that the first response time was 28 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Medirama.net rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

medirama.net performance score

78

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

68/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

82/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

79/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value240 ms

85/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.224

56/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.8 s

89/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

medirama.net

28 ms

www.zstreaming.net

1252 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

435 ms

styles.css

217 ms

pagenavi-css.css

458 ms

Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Medirama.net, 73% (63 requests) were made to Zstreaming.net and 5% (4 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Zstreaming.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 410.1 kB (43%)

Content Size

952.8 kB

After Optimization

542.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Medirama.net main page is 952.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 470.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 253 B

  • Original 459 B
  • After minification 362 B
  • After compression 206 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 97 B, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 253 B or 55% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 29.6 kB

  • Original 450.2 kB
  • After minification 420.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Medirama images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 354.3 kB

  • Original 470.6 kB
  • After minification 366.8 kB
  • After compression 116.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 354.3 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 26.0 kB

  • Original 31.5 kB
  • After minification 24.0 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Medirama.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 26.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (25%)

Requests Now

79

After Optimization

59

The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Medirama. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

medirama.net accessibility score

49

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

medirama.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

medirama.net SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Medirama.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Medirama.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Medirama. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: