Tools & Wizards About Us
metaefficient.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 87% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

metaefficient.com

MetaEfficient

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

46 ms

Resources Loaded

472 ms

Page Rendered

554 ms

metaefficient.com screenshot

About Website

Visit metaefficient.com now to see the best up-to-date Meta Efficient content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about metaefficient.com

The Guide To Efficient Living

Visit metaefficient.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Metaefficient.com page load time and found that the first response time was 46 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

metaefficient.com performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

31/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

56/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value900 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.3 s

73/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.metaefficient.com

46 ms

default-style.css

11 ms

css

36 ms

style.css

11 ms

icon.css

19 ms

Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Metaefficient.com, 44% (11 requests) were made to Cdn2.metaefficient.com and 24% (6 requests) were made to Cdn.metaefficient.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (70 ms) relates to the external source Cdn3.metaefficient.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 581.6 kB (39%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

922.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Metaefficient.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 748.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 38.9 kB

  • Original 49.0 kB
  • After minification 47.2 kB
  • After compression 10.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 748.2 kB
  • After minification 746.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Meta Efficient images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 283.1 kB

  • Original 404.7 kB
  • After minification 397.2 kB
  • After compression 121.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 283.1 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 257.9 kB

  • Original 301.9 kB
  • After minification 285.7 kB
  • After compression 44.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Metaefficient.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 257.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (68%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Meta Efficient. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.metaefficient.com

www.metaefficient.com

46 ms

default-style.css

default-style.css

11 ms

css

css

36 ms

style.css

style.css

11 ms

icon.css

icon.css

19 ms

css

css

45 ms

fa-icon-classes.css

fa-icon-classes.css

15 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

29 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

26 ms

x-head.min.js

x-head.min.js

28 ms

cs-head.min.js

cs-head.min.js

26 ms

ouibounce.js

ouibounce.js

26 ms

custom.js

custom.js

25 ms

x-body.min.js

x-body.min.js

26 ms

x-icon.min.js

x-icon.min.js

28 ms

cs-body.min.js

cs-body.min.js

27 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

27 ms

50872_c111a100d74878d7_b-944x944.jpg

50872_c111a100d74878d7_b-944x944.jpg

70 ms

Julie-with-BOB-1040x780.jpg

Julie-with-BOB-1040x780.jpg

68 ms

SunLabz-c-Rechargeable-Batteries-1040x751.jpg

SunLabz-c-Rechargeable-Batteries-1040x751.jpg

67 ms

js

js

44 ms

4pcs-KENTLI-1-5v-AA-PH5-2800mWh-Rechargeable-Li-ion-Li-polymer-Lithium-battery-4-slots1.jpg

4pcs-KENTLI-1-5v-AA-PH5-2800mWh-Rechargeable-Li-ion-Li-polymer-Lithium-battery-4-slots1.jpg

6 ms

4GwpJM7qx9X5Obd9KsnKxQ.ttf

4GwpJM7qx9X5Obd9KsnKxQ.ttf

39 ms

zpv3sOKAbMf4wff105oLjw.ttf

zpv3sOKAbMf4wff105oLjw.ttf

58 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

5 ms

Accessibility Review

metaefficient.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

metaefficient.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

metaefficient.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Metaefficient.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Metaefficient.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

metaefficient.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Meta Efficient. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: