Tools & Wizards About Us
metapercept.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

metapercept.com

Metapercept | Technical Writing | Software Engineering | DITA-XML |

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

136 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

929 ms

metapercept.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to metapercept.com homepage info - get ready to check Metapercept best content right away, or after learning these important things about metapercept.com

Technical writing services and solutions company, Leading information architecture providers in the APAC region, End-to-end DITA-XML services and solution providers, What we do, Our success stories, W...

Visit metapercept.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Metapercept.com page load time and found that the first response time was 136 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

metapercept.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.7 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,750 ms

10/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.024

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.3 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

metapercept.com

136 ms

metapercept.com

239 ms

all.min.css

29 ms

main.css

55 ms

element.js

45 ms

Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (91 requests) were addressed to the original Metapercept.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Translate.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (574 ms) belongs to the original domain Metapercept.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 454.9 kB (19%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Metapercept.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 61.5 kB

  • Original 74.2 kB
  • After minification 74.0 kB
  • After compression 12.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 389.7 kB

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Metapercept needs image optimization as it can save up to 389.7 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 518 B

  • Original 210.6 kB
  • After minification 210.4 kB
  • After compression 210.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 157.7 kB
  • After minification 155.6 kB
  • After compression 154.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Metapercept.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (23%)

Requests Now

87

After Optimization

67

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Metapercept. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

metapercept.com

metapercept.com

136 ms

metapercept.com

metapercept.com

239 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

29 ms

main.css

main.css

55 ms

element.js

element.js

45 ms

smtp.js

smtp.js

340 ms

d04101ba34c21127.css

d04101ba34c21127.css

236 ms

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

238 ms

webpack-b8f8d6679aaa5f42.js

webpack-b8f8d6679aaa5f42.js

162 ms

framework-95c4ba85c5e1b959.js

framework-95c4ba85c5e1b959.js

280 ms

main-093a9f79ef640910.js

main-093a9f79ef640910.js

241 ms

_app-4a8d7ef864819a9b.js

_app-4a8d7ef864819a9b.js

225 ms

461-a9b1e42169797a8b.js

461-a9b1e42169797a8b.js

273 ms

230-2c3feb4c79f8e8be.js

230-2c3feb4c79f8e8be.js

279 ms

index-1894a4ab2d8a29a1.js

index-1894a4ab2d8a29a1.js

290 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

290 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

293 ms

google-translate.css

google-translate.css

274 ms

google-picker.css

google-picker.css

280 ms

translator-with-flag.css

translator-with-flag.css

280 ms

successStories.css

successStories.css

291 ms

black-theme.css

black-theme.css

290 ms

chatbot.css

chatbot.css

293 ms

search-modal.css

search-modal.css

326 ms

cookie.png

cookie.png

71 ms

Metapercept_footer_logo2-black.svg

Metapercept_footer_logo2-black.svg

72 ms

english.png

english.png

68 ms

spain.png

spain.png

78 ms

german.png

german.png

69 ms

france.png

france.png

69 ms

ofp-phone.png

ofp-phone.png

118 ms

ofc-mail-icon.png

ofc-mail-icon.png

118 ms

ofc-locaiton.png

ofc-locaiton.png

118 ms

image7.png

image7.png

124 ms

img3.svg

img3.svg

118 ms

image8.png

image8.png

222 ms

img4.svg

img4.svg

176 ms

image5.png

image5.png

277 ms

img1.svg

img1.svg

184 ms

image6.png

image6.png

231 ms

img2.svg

img2.svg

188 ms

ADBSafegate.png

ADBSafegate.png

233 ms

Amdocs.png

Amdocs.png

283 ms

analogdevices.png

analogdevices.png

234 ms

AnalyzeIT.png

AnalyzeIT.png

275 ms

Aurigo.png

Aurigo.png

285 ms

Conga.png

Conga.png

286 ms

CorumHealthSystem.png

CorumHealthSystem.png

288 ms

Enablex.jpg

Enablex.jpg

329 ms

EternalRobotics.jpg

EternalRobotics.jpg

330 ms

Finaureus.jpg

Finaureus.jpg

337 ms

GEDigital.png

GEDigital.png

339 ms

GieseckeDevrient.png

GieseckeDevrient.png

395 ms

ITeXchange.jpg

ITeXchange.jpg

342 ms

MHIACanada.png

MHIACanada.png

382 ms

Mitel.png

Mitel.png

383 ms

MojoNetworks.png

MojoNetworks.png

389 ms

MYRO.png

MYRO.png

393 ms

NFS.jpg

NFS.jpg

396 ms

Nirmata.jpg

Nirmata.jpg

372 ms

nOps.jpg

nOps.jpg

370 ms

O-I.png

O-I.png

377 ms

OnPlan.png

OnPlan.png

380 ms

Pipeliner.png

Pipeliner.png

374 ms

PlanonSoftware.png

PlanonSoftware.png

375 ms

fa-light-300.88ccdef6.ttf

fa-light-300.88ccdef6.ttf

574 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

46 ms

flUhRq6tzZclQEJ-Vdg-IuiaDsNa.woff

flUhRq6tzZclQEJ-Vdg-IuiaDsNa.woff

57 ms

fa-thin-100.7c64f7d8.ttf

fa-thin-100.7c64f7d8.ttf

548 ms

fa-regular-400.26ed472d.ttf

fa-regular-400.26ed472d.ttf

549 ms

fa-solid-900.0111ff7c.ttf

fa-solid-900.0111ff7c.ttf

543 ms

fa-brands-400.992138ef.ttf

fa-brands-400.992138ef.ttf

438 ms

PlatformInstruments-PIES.png

PlatformInstruments-PIES.png

389 ms

RWS.png

RWS.png

399 ms

RyussiTechnologies.jpg

RyussiTechnologies.jpg

429 ms

TechMahindra.png

TechMahindra.png

440 ms

TotalCloud.jpg

TotalCloud.jpg

480 ms

vertiv.png

vertiv.png

472 ms

Zetaris.png

Zetaris.png

472 ms

web-designing.png

web-designing.png

473 ms

letter.png

letter.png

437 ms

shield.png

shield.png

440 ms

content.png

content.png

444 ms

copywriter.png

copywriter.png

457 ms

info.png

info.png

471 ms

document.png

document.png

473 ms

staff.png

staff.png

436 ms

case-study.png

case-study.png

439 ms

drive.png

drive.png

443 ms

local-area-network.png

local-area-network.png

455 ms

ai.png

ai.png

467 ms

maintenance.png

maintenance.png

432 ms

testi-icon-bg.png

testi-icon-bg.png

434 ms

NASSCOM_Badge_footer.png

NASSCOM_Badge_footer.png

434 ms

iso1.png

iso1.png

449 ms

iso2.png

iso2.png

508 ms

Accessibility Review

metapercept.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

metapercept.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

metapercept.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Metapercept.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Metapercept.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

metapercept.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Metapercept. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: