Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

michaelgaster.com

Michael Gaster Studio | Limited Edition Prints & Exhibition News

Page Load Speed

963 ms in total

First Response

97 ms

Resources Loaded

791 ms

Page Rendered

75 ms

michaelgaster.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Michael Gaster content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about michaelgaster.com

Michael Gaster is a writer and fine artist working in pen and ink. Learn about his latest exhibitions and buy new limited edition print releases from his studio.

Visit michaelgaster.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Michaelgaster.com page load time and found that the first response time was 97 ms and then it took 866 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

michaelgaster.com performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

67/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.2 s

77/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value570 ms

52/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.0 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.michaelgaster.com

97 ms

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

36 ms

minified.js

43 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

97 ms

polyfill.min.js

504 ms

Our browser made a total of 13 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Michaelgaster.com, 77% (10 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 8% (1 request) were made to Polyfill.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (504 ms) relates to the external source Polyfill.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 264.3 kB (46%)

Content Size

573.1 kB

After Optimization

308.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Michaelgaster.com main page is 573.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 344.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 261.5 kB

  • Original 344.2 kB
  • After minification 342.6 kB
  • After compression 82.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 261.5 kB or 76% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.8 kB

  • Original 228.9 kB
  • After minification 228.8 kB
  • After compression 226.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (92%)

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

1

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Michael Gaster. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

michaelgaster.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Best Practices

michaelgaster.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

michaelgaster.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Michaelgaster.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Michaelgaster.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: