4.1 sec in total
363 ms
3.4 sec
349 ms
Visit michipel.com now to see the best up-to-date Michipel content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about michipel.com
We work so hard to make sure you get to see only high quality reviews. That's the goal of Michipel Blog. We say it as we believe it is; because it is us.
Visit michipel.comWe analyzed Michipel.com page load time and found that the first response time was 363 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
michipel.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
30/100
10%
Value4.8 s
30/100
25%
Value5.9 s
47/100
10%
Value730 ms
41/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value4.8 s
78/100
10%
363 ms
335 ms
110 ms
97 ms
86 ms
Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Michipel.com, 29% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (529 ms) belongs to the original domain Michipel.com.
Page size can be reduced by 72.2 kB (19%)
386.8 kB
314.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Michipel.com main page is 386.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 247.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 57.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Michipel images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 6.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 6.8 kB or 14% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Michipel.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.9 kB or 23% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
9
9
The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Michipel. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
www.michipel.com
363 ms
d026f02ce13935f0c23f4ce6a12ed05e.css
335 ms
css
110 ms
lazyload.min.js
97 ms
4982d6af92515e0da57db24f81abbf80.js
86 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
111 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff
122 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff
157 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
167 ms
Berry-Gordy-net-worth-1-768x859.jpg
529 ms
Best-Sewing-Machine-under-300-768x558.jpg
477 ms
Difference-Between-Receiver-And-Amplifier.jpg
289 ms
Bread-Machine-Troubleshooting-768x512.jpg
413 ms
How-To-Change-Input-On-LG-TV-Without-Remote-768x512.jpg
408 ms
michipel.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
michipel.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
michipel.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Michipel.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Michipel.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
michipel.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Michipel. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: