6.6 sec in total
1.3 sec
4.9 sec
385 ms
Click here to check amazing Micro Flag content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about microflag.net
MicroFlag is a small – and by that we mean really small, hence the company name – company with a commitment to provide custom flags for affordable rates and no minimum quantity.
Visit microflag.netWe analyzed Microflag.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 5.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
microflag.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.3 s
3/100
10%
Value7.6 s
4/100
25%
Value14.6 s
1/100
10%
Value250 ms
85/100
30%
Value0.159
73/100
15%
Value13.1 s
12/100
10%
1301 ms
139 ms
278 ms
414 ms
415 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Microflag.net, 8% (5 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Stats.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Microflag.net.
Page size can be reduced by 153.0 kB (9%)
1.8 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Microflag.net main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 88.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Micro Flag images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 11.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Microflag.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (65%)
57
20
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Micro Flag. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
microflag.net
1301 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
139 ms
style.min.css
278 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
414 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
415 ms
wc-blocks-vendors-style.css
423 ms
wc-blocks-style.css
571 ms
css
46 ms
us.woocommerce.css
425 ms
all.css
52 ms
us-base.css
426 ms
font-awesome.css
551 ms
font-mdfi.css
552 ms
style.css
708 ms
responsive.css
568 ms
v4-shims.css
63 ms
jetpack.css
576 ms
pricing-table.css
689 ms
deals-table.css
689 ms
jquery.min.js
855 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
726 ms
s-202435.js
26 ms
frontend.js
727 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
825 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
825 ms
js.cookie.min.js
845 ms
woocommerce.min.js
849 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
1014 ms
button.js
1115 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
1014 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
1015 ms
jquery.simpleplaceholder.js
1014 ms
imagesloaded.js
1015 ms
us.core.js
1015 ms
us.widgets.js
1149 ms
us.theme.js
1152 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1154 ms
jquery.parallax.js
1154 ms
jquery.isotope.js
1155 ms
e-202435.js
22 ms
MICROFLAG1.png
360 ms
MicroFlag-Background.png
1041 ms
MICROFLAG1-150x150.png
382 ms
Yaroslav-Signature.png
386 ms
h-25twJGhew-350x350.jpg
389 ms
westarctica-flag-2-600x400.png
963 ms
5209196_orig-600x400.jpg
497 ms
8306091_orig-600x400.jpg
521 ms
5075617_orig-600x400.jpg
666 ms
1848897_orig-600x400.jpg
528 ms
1323256_orig-600x400.jpg
633 ms
7458794_orig-600x400.jpg
659 ms
2049778_orig-600x400.jpg
669 ms
81656578_10158151929322975_2677131833757401088_o-150x150.jpg
770 ms
deniztezcan-150x150.jpeg
798 ms
Erik-White-150x150.png
806 ms
Sans-titre-150x150.png
809 ms
MICROFLAG-%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%8F-%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%8F-150x150.png
907 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
21 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
62 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
15 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
62 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
63 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
946 ms
microflag.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
microflag.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
microflag.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Microflag.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Microflag.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
microflag.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Micro Flag. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: