5.8 sec in total
1.1 sec
2.8 sec
1.8 sec
Welcome to microgeek.ru homepage info - get ready to check Microgeek best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about microgeek.ru
Visit microgeek.ruWe analyzed Microgeek.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
microgeek.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
24/100
10%
Value5.5 s
19/100
25%
Value7.7 s
25/100
10%
Value1,210 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value14.6 s
8/100
10%
1141 ms
899 ms
106 ms
569 ms
708 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Microgeek.ru, 26% (10 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 10% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Microgeek.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 130.1 kB (23%)
561.9 kB
431.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Microgeek.ru main page is 561.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 387.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 128.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 128.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 929 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Microgeek images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 597 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (37%)
35
22
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Microgeek. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
microgeek.ru
1141 ms
tag.js
899 ms
adsbygoogle.js
106 ms
aci.js
569 ms
zp.js
708 ms
promo.php
418 ms
promo.php
454 ms
promo.php
544 ms
show_ads_impl.js
240 ms
zrt_lookup.html
38 ms
ads
130 ms
code.js
25 ms
code.js
33 ms
jquery-1.4.4.min.js
142 ms
ca-pub-5954147232565215
138 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
12 ms
watch.js
1 ms
version.js
149 ms
jquery.image_player_001.js
38 ms
bongacams.png
19 ms
0db16660841e2a572aacd243a2396114_thumb_medium.jpg
78 ms
ads
80 ms
ads
167 ms
ads
164 ms
ads
161 ms
ads
157 ms
ads
145 ms
ads
144 ms
ads
198 ms
0db16660841e2a572aacd243a2396114_thumb_medium.jpg
41 ms
advert.gif
566 ms
sync_cookie_image_decide
133 ms
sodar
71 ms
impression.html
141 ms
extra.js
262 ms
sodar2.js
18 ms
runner.html
8 ms
aframe
35 ms
q3_ozqIbHCwHEmDedgzG-D6UnUyzi2L496FFdqoLokA.js
4 ms
microgeek.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
microgeek.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
microgeek.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RU
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Microgeek.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Microgeek.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
microgeek.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Microgeek. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: