11.4 sec in total
677 ms
4.6 sec
6.2 sec
Click here to check amazing Microswift content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about microswift.co.uk
Croft are pleased to announce the acquisition of business IT support specialists, Pure IT. Discover more.
Visit microswift.co.ukWe analyzed Microswift.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 677 ms and then it took 10.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
microswift.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
40/100
10%
Value12.1 s
0/100
25%
Value10.0 s
9/100
10%
Value4,990 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value19.9 s
2/100
10%
677 ms
944 ms
32 ms
31 ms
37 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Microswift.co.uk, 15% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Secure.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 395.5 kB (34%)
1.2 MB
770.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Microswift.co.uk main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 443.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 224.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 224.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Microswift images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 26.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 145.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Microswift.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 145.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (82%)
60
11
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Microswift. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pureitgroup.co.uk
677 ms
siteground-optimizer-combined-css-81cc45a8e914a4587560d0f794151aff.css
944 ms
jquery.min.js
32 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
31 ms
cookie-law-info.min.js
37 ms
extension.min.js
476 ms
extension.min.js
380 ms
headerScript.min.js
37 ms
js
76 ms
tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js
57 ms
email-decode.min.js
37 ms
hsimp.jquery.min.js
46 ms
hsimp_init.js
38 ms
password.js
362 ms
main.js
62 ms
lazysizes.min.js
49 ms
gprofiles.js
115 ms
wpgroho.min.js
64 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
64 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
105 ms
form-builder.min.js
104 ms
advanced.min.js
455 ms
multi-step.min.js
500 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
645 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
714 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
811 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
502 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
503 ms
hooks.min.js
508 ms
i18n.min.js
508 ms
frontend.min.js
511 ms
waypoints.min.js
513 ms
core.min.js
523 ms
frontend.min.js
526 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
522 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
531 ms
e-202240.js
116 ms
v652eace1692a40cfa3763df669d7439c1639079717194
181 ms
hotjar-1677575.js
972 ms
tracker
968 ms
fbevents.js
717 ms
PureIT-1024x336.png
880 ms
Pure-IT-Pill-Opacity.png
879 ms
logo-cookieyes.svg
356 ms
ConnectWise-4.png
690 ms
SimpleHelp-1.png
879 ms
a-bg-bluegrn.jpg
527 ms
a-tech-support.jpg
523 ms
analytics.js
709 ms
js
572 ms
default
506 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
506 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
696 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
1522 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
1521 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
1521 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
1523 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
1521 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
1520 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
1732 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf
1732 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
1732 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
1732 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1516 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1516 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1516 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1516 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
608 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1057 ms
eicons.woff
1515 ms
identity.js
288 ms
357532108710823
1049 ms
vbtracker.min.css
1462 ms
tracker-compressed-nofancybox.css
1629 ms
modules.61e17720cf639c3e96a7.js
1345 ms
tp.min.js
1326 ms
hovercard.min.css
176 ms
services.min.css
625 ms
collect
587 ms
box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html
1493 ms
microswift.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
microswift.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
microswift.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Microswift.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Microswift.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
microswift.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Microswift. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: