Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 39% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

miliol.org

米粒在线|米粒 | 分享知识,创造价值。

Page Load Speed

65.8 sec in total

First Response

4.9 sec

Resources Loaded

60.2 sec

Page Rendered

785 ms

miliol.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Miliol content for China. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about miliol.org

米粒在线|米粒

Visit miliol.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Miliol.org page load time and found that the first response time was 4.9 sec and then it took 60.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 8 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

miliol.org performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.8 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value25.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,780 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

miliol.org

4907 ms

www.miliol.org

19240 ms

style.css

13279 ms

cms.css

765 ms

jquery.min.js

7124 ms

Our browser made a total of 119 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 19% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Miliol.org, 9% (11 requests) were made to Cpro.baidustatic.com and 8% (10 requests) were made to Pos.baidu.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.3 sec) relates to the external source West.cn.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 507.4 kB (34%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Miliol.org main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 751.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 76.4 kB

  • Original 96.3 kB
  • After minification 96.1 kB
  • After compression 19.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 18.6 kB

  • Original 751.3 kB
  • After minification 732.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Miliol images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 407.9 kB

  • Original 658.3 kB
  • After minification 545.0 kB
  • After compression 250.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 407.9 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 4.4 kB

  • Original 6.8 kB
  • After minification 6.8 kB
  • After compression 2.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Miliol.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.4 kB or 65% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (52%)

Requests Now

105

After Optimization

50

The browser has sent 105 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Miliol. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 42 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

miliol.org accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

miliol.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

miliol.org SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    ZH

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Miliol.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Miliol.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Miliol. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: