4.3 sec in total
315 ms
3.2 sec
833 ms
Click here to check amazing Milrab content for Norway. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about milrab.no
Visit milrab.noWe analyzed Milrab.no page load time and found that the first response time was 315 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
milrab.no performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
61/100
10%
Value12.1 s
0/100
25%
Value10.2 s
8/100
10%
Value1,090 ms
24/100
30%
Value0.516
15/100
15%
Value16.7 s
5/100
10%
315 ms
564 ms
141 ms
29 ms
1156 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 30% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Milrab.no, 42% (35 requests) were made to Img2cdn.wmxstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Identity.webmercs.com.
Page size can be reduced by 662.1 kB (71%)
932.7 kB
270.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Milrab.no main page is 932.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 766.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.7 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Milrab needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.7 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 534.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 534.8 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 100.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Milrab.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 100.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (35%)
74
48
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Milrab. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
milrab.no
315 ms
www.milrab.no
564 ms
1446007.js
141 ms
css
29 ms
logonblock.css
1156 ms
thirdparty.css
411 ms
root.min.v2612.css
421 ms
jquery-1.8.3.min.js
85 ms
Common.v57a89656.js
219 ms
wmx.list-item-selector.v4f0edd4d.js
231 ms
bootstrap.min.v38087ea0.js
333 ms
utilities.vedca59f5.js
232 ms
WebResource.axd
323 ms
WebResource.axd
347 ms
WebResource.axd
458 ms
WebResource.axd
429 ms
WebResource.axd
441 ms
WebResource.axd
464 ms
ScriptResource.axd
510 ms
ScriptResource.axd
513 ms
js
540 ms
event
25 ms
dc.js
35 ms
pic-progress.v2456abfd.gif
126 ms
0
1113 ms
button-search2.v5f1d2ca1.gif
124 ms
0
146 ms
0
145 ms
0
148 ms
0
146 ms
0
149 ms
0
146 ms
360
146 ms
360
149 ms
360
150 ms
360
151 ms
341
166 ms
341
166 ms
341
166 ms
0
164 ms
0
167 ms
0
168 ms
0
169 ms
0
168 ms
0
171 ms
0
169 ms
0
168 ms
0
169 ms
0
170 ms
0
169 ms
0
190 ms
0
179 ms
0
203 ms
0
190 ms
0
189 ms
0
194 ms
0
194 ms
0
194 ms
0
197 ms
151
203 ms
gtm.js
73 ms
logo.v31c8ca67.png
134 ms
icon_mail.v2a0d8f95.png
137 ms
icon_info.vab9141cb.png
106 ms
icon_login.v4355ad57.png
117 ms
b-top-menu_bkg.vca4b842f.png
185 ms
__utm.gif
15 ms
__utm.gif
43 ms
ga-audiences
71 ms
icomoon.ttf
273 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
41 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
52 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
53 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
53 ms
goal.min.js
27 ms
preload.js
304 ms
conversion.js
32 ms
loader0.js
64 ms
50 ms
5488-704-10-7489.js
30 ms
21 ms
c
89 ms
application2.js
109 ms
milrab.no accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
milrab.no best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
milrab.no SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Milrab.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Milrab.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
milrab.no
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Milrab. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: