1.1 sec in total
88 ms
966 ms
81 ms
Click here to check amazing Minneapolis Granite content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about minneapolisgranite.com
At Minneapolis Granite, our dedicated artisans work closely with you to listen, visualize and create from our extensive palette of granite, marble and other natural stone colors to create a unique, cu...
Visit minneapolisgranite.comWe analyzed Minneapolisgranite.com page load time and found that the first response time was 88 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
minneapolisgranite.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
44/100
10%
Value9.2 s
1/100
25%
Value5.9 s
49/100
10%
Value21,480 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value29.6 s
0/100
10%
88 ms
70 ms
70 ms
121 ms
117 ms
Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Minneapolisgranite.com, 38% (13 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 32% (11 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (549 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 272.6 kB (47%)
582.8 kB
310.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Minneapolisgranite.com main page is 582.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 333.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 255.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 255.1 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Minneapolis Granite images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 227 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (45%)
31
17
The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Minneapolis Granite. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.minneapolisgranite.com
88 ms
minified.js
70 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
70 ms
polyfill.min.js
121 ms
bootstrap-features.dbbc2053.bundle.min.js
117 ms
main.c5638ec5.bundle.min.js
118 ms
lodash.min.js
118 ms
react.production.min.js
114 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
115 ms
js
239 ms
wix-perf-measure.bundle.min.js
115 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
116 ms
minneapolis_granite.png
268 ms
b4981e_cdcb8214f45c4e64894b619b79c04605~mv2.jpg
238 ms
b4981e_c4db873eea1f40bdb2c592d84aa75e6d~mv2.png
362 ms
b4981e_262987d737764806a8ba6da75b4648f0~mv2.jpg
388 ms
b4981e_3df1b407fe134833bbf86ccb3a40ded3~mv2.png
237 ms
b4981e_239124a2a5d94d23ad68a49062ced2d2~mv2.jpg
306 ms
b4981e_2026841c5aff4a75b5f0a5651cf30664~mv2.png
362 ms
b4981e_014286bdfa81439da31e5b4cce36340a~mv2.jpg
421 ms
b4981e_8d0b6c795f2a4a7292b33ebd53dd438e~mv2.png
462 ms
b4981e_dba08f04865d42c4ac83dc02024e7262~mv2.jpg
442 ms
Minneapolis_Granite_Interiors_white.png
549 ms
conversion_async.js
59 ms
loader.js
37 ms
9362bca5-b362-4543-a051-2129e2def911.woff
10 ms
call-tracking_7.js
4 ms
62 ms
wcm
14 ms
24 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
13 ms
bolt-performance
40 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
11 ms
right-arrow.svg
9 ms
minneapolisgranite.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
minneapolisgranite.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
minneapolisgranite.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Minneapolisgranite.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Minneapolisgranite.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
minneapolisgranite.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: