3.9 sec in total
244 ms
3.3 sec
315 ms
Visit mirrormirror.uk.com now to see the best up-to-date Mirror content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mirrormirror.uk.com
Mirror Mirror Bridal shop - Brides best friend for wedding dresses. Searching for your dream wedding dress? Visit our London boutique to see our extensive designer collection including our own Mirror ...
Visit mirrormirror.uk.comWe analyzed Mirrormirror.uk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 244 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
mirrormirror.uk.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
15/100
10%
Value30.2 s
0/100
25%
Value16.5 s
0/100
10%
Value360 ms
72/100
30%
Value0.012
100/100
15%
Value19.1 s
2/100
10%
244 ms
429 ms
165 ms
232 ms
328 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Mirrormirror.uk.com, 10% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Mirrormirror.uk.com.
Page size can be reduced by 14.1 kB (0%)
5.5 MB
5.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Mirrormirror.uk.com main page is 5.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by -8 B
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This web page is already compressed.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mirror images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 12.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mirrormirror.uk.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (86%)
76
11
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mirror . We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
mirrormirror.uk.com
244 ms
mirrormirror.uk.com
429 ms
style.min.css
165 ms
wc-blocks-vendors-style.css
232 ms
wc-blocks-style.css
328 ms
front.min.css
236 ms
light.css
241 ms
lc_lightbox.min.css
238 ms
rs6.css
259 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
307 ms
woocommerce.css
315 ms
form-themes.css
336 ms
be.css
467 ms
animations.min.css
345 ms
fontawesome.css
400 ms
jplayer.blue.monday.css
392 ms
responsive.css
419 ms
css
31 ms
woocommerce.css
417 ms
tablepress-combined.min.css
425 ms
style.css
479 ms
font-awesome.min.css
479 ms
frontend.min.css
498 ms
galleria.ggallery_minimal.css
491 ms
custom.css
501 ms
front.min.js
476 ms
jquery.min.js
534 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
495 ms
rbtools.min.js
584 ms
rs6.min.js
685 ms
formreset.min.css
524 ms
datepicker.min.css
554 ms
formsmain.min.css
597 ms
readyclass.min.css
605 ms
browsers.min.css
611 ms
alloy_finger.min.js
632 ms
lc_lightbox.gg.min.js
676 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
669 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
720 ms
js.cookie.min.js
630 ms
woocommerce.min.js
566 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
598 ms
core.min.js
596 ms
tabs.min.js
647 ms
plugins.js
662 ms
menu.js
579 ms
animations.min.js
569 ms
jplayer.min.js
596 ms
scripts.js
604 ms
comment-reply.min.js
586 ms
frontend.js
607 ms
wp-embed.min.js
540 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
575 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
595 ms
dom-ready.min.js
569 ms
hooks.min.js
539 ms
i18n.min.js
539 ms
a11y.min.js
587 ms
jquery.json.min.js
576 ms
gravityforms.min.js
579 ms
datepicker.min.js
574 ms
datepicker-legacy.min.js
535 ms
datepicker.min.js
535 ms
jquery.textareaCounter.plugin.min.js
564 ms
utils.min.js
544 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
539 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
497 ms
forms.js
502 ms
mirror-mirror-logo-grey_2601.png
435 ms
Mirror-Mirror-143r1.jpg
953 ms
Mirror-Mirror-86.jpg
755 ms
Mirror-Mirror-67r1.jpg
948 ms
Mirror-Mirror-202.jpg
570 ms
Mirror-Mirror-180a.jpg
740 ms
Mirror-Mirror-160.jpg
637 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJabMl2xMB.ttf
19 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJN7Ml2xMB.ttf
24 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJ0LQl2xMB.ttf
35 ms
icons.woff
607 ms
mirrormirror.uk.com
1437 ms
box_shadow.png
380 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
4 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf
13 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
14 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAXC-v.ttf
23 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI9w2_Gwfo.ttf
24 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_Gwfo.ttf
24 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
81 ms
mirrormirror.uk.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
mirrormirror.uk.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
mirrormirror.uk.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
![]()
EN
![]()
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mirrormirror.uk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Mirrormirror.uk.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
mirrormirror.uk.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mirror . Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: