Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 63% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    57% of websites

  • 73

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

mirrormoon.org

mirror moon

Page Load Speed

11.5 sec in total

First Response

5.5 sec

Resources Loaded

5.6 sec

Page Rendered

378 ms

mirrormoon.org screenshot

About Website

Visit mirrormoon.org now to see the best up-to-date Mirror Moon content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mirrormoon.org

Visit mirrormoon.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Mirrormoon.org page load time and found that the first response time was 5.5 sec and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mirrormoon.org performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

71/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,010 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.232

54/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.6 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mirrormoon.org

5475 ms

style.css

174 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

46 ms

phase3.png

89 ms

logo.png

93 ms

Our browser made a total of 11 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Mirrormoon.org and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Mirrormoon.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 110.0 kB (62%)

Content Size

176.3 kB

After Optimization

66.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Mirrormoon.org main page is 176.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 58.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 32.8 kB

  • Original 40.9 kB
  • After minification 36.4 kB
  • After compression 8.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.4 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 234 B

  • Original 42.0 kB
  • After minification 41.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mirror Moon images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 27.1 kB

  • Original 35.2 kB
  • After minification 35.2 kB
  • After compression 8.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 27.1 kB or 77% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 49.8 kB

  • Original 58.2 kB
  • After minification 40.9 kB
  • After compression 8.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mirrormoon.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 49.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

10

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mirror Moon. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

mirrormoon.org accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

mirrormoon.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

mirrormoon.org SEO score

73

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mirrormoon.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mirrormoon.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mirror Moon. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: