12.6 sec in total
2.3 sec
10.1 sec
243 ms
Welcome to mj-aesthetic.com homepage info - get ready to check Mj Aesthetic best content right away, or after learning these important things about mj-aesthetic.com
We are Malaysia Anti Aging,Malaysia Skin care,Facial,Slimming,Malaysia Aesthetic Clinic based in Shah Alam.
Visit mj-aesthetic.comWe analyzed Mj-aesthetic.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 10.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
mj-aesthetic.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.8 s
0/100
10%
Value11.5 s
0/100
25%
Value18.3 s
0/100
10%
Value530 ms
55/100
30%
Value0.443
21/100
15%
Value15.3 s
7/100
10%
2280 ms
258 ms
33 ms
514 ms
755 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Mj-aesthetic.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Mj-aesthetic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (63%)
2.4 MB
888.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Mj-aesthetic.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.1 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 65.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mj Aesthetic images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 896.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 896.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 489.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mj-aesthetic.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 489.0 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (62%)
63
24
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mj Aesthetic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.mj-aesthetic.com
2280 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
258 ms
css
33 ms
global.css
514 ms
main.css
755 ms
bootstrap.css
1729 ms
bootstrap-theme.css
1003 ms
wpbc-tippy-popover.css
755 ms
wpbc-tippy-times.css
758 ms
material-design-icons.css
1279 ms
wpbc_time-selector.css
1000 ms
grey.css
1005 ms
client.css
1514 ms
calendar.css
1491 ms
premium-steel.css
1252 ms
timeline_v2.css
1505 ms
timeline_skin_v2.css
1504 ms
jquery.js
1791 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1738 ms
circle-progress.js
1755 ms
global.js
1756 ms
wpbc_vars.js
1764 ms
popper.js
2216 ms
tippy-bundle.umd.js
2227 ms
jquery.datepick.wpbc.9.0.js
2521 ms
wpbc_all.js
3509 ms
client.js
2018 ms
create_booking.js
2301 ms
wpbc_times.js
2274 ms
wpbc_time-selector.js
2463 ms
timeline_v2.js
2474 ms
widgetkit-81e87792.css
2529 ms
widgetkit-33d1daf9.js
2557 ms
gzip.php
2982 ms
gzip.php
2731 ms
app.js
2769 ms
underscore.min.js
2781 ms
wp-util.min.js
2810 ms
wp-embed.min.js
2730 ms
shadows.php
2520 ms
lightbox.js
517 ms
mediaelement-and-player.js
524 ms
spotlight.js
514 ms
header-shadow.png
752 ms
logotop.png
496 ms
slide1.jpg
1258 ms
nav.png
494 ms
shadow5.png
497 ms
timthumb.php
509 ms
timthumb.php
526 ms
timthumb.php
550 ms
timthumb.php
762 ms
timthumb.php
766 ms
iconfb.png
508 ms
iconinsta.png
518 ms
glyphicons-halflings-white.png
767 ms
Greyscale_Basic_Regular-webfont.woff
765 ms
slideshow.js
432 ms
all.js
144 ms
all.js
22 ms
slide3.jpg
1034 ms
slide2.jpg
757 ms
slide4.jpg
748 ms
slide51.jpg
1005 ms
mayjunetan.jpg
761 ms
mj-aesthetic.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
mj-aesthetic.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
mj-aesthetic.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mj-aesthetic.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mj-aesthetic.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mj-aesthetic.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mj Aesthetic. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: