2.9 sec in total
820 ms
1.6 sec
520 ms
Click here to check amazing Mobile Network Comparison content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mobilenetworkcomparison.org.uk
Mobile Network Comparison helps you pick the best mobile phone network in the UK, get free SIM cards or find unlimited data offers.
Visit mobilenetworkcomparison.org.ukWe analyzed Mobilenetworkcomparison.org.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 820 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
mobilenetworkcomparison.org.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
55/100
10%
Value4.7 s
33/100
25%
Value3.7 s
85/100
10%
Value530 ms
56/100
30%
Value0.08
94/100
15%
Value7.8 s
45/100
10%
820 ms
121 ms
122 ms
35 ms
161 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Mobilenetworkcomparison.org.uk, 10% (6 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (820 ms) belongs to the original domain Mobilenetworkcomparison.org.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 128.7 kB (26%)
497.9 kB
369.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Mobilenetworkcomparison.org.uk main page is 497.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 245.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 78.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.3 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 28.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Mobile Network Comparison needs image optimization as it can save up to 28.3 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 14.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 7.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mobilenetworkcomparison.org.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.8 kB or 35% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (79%)
56
12
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mobile Network Comparison. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
mobilenetworkcomparison.org.uk
820 ms
reset.css
121 ms
style.css
122 ms
shareaholic.js
35 ms
rating.css
161 ms
style.min.css
160 ms
frontend.css
162 ms
frontend.min.css
180 ms
jquery.js
249 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
194 ms
gdsr.js
194 ms
core.min.js
193 ms
widget.min.js
239 ms
tabs.min.js
266 ms
shortcodes.js
264 ms
frontend.min.js
266 ms
default.css
310 ms
shortcodes.css
312 ms
custom.css
314 ms
plugin.css
316 ms
datatables.css
317 ms
sortable.js
359 ms
analytics.js
39 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
242 ms
collect
34 ms
js
70 ms
bg.jpg
67 ms
nav.jpg
66 ms
main.png
63 ms
about.jpg
64 ms
mobile-network-comparison-banner.png
121 ms
about_fold.png
70 ms
connect_grad.png
122 ms
ico-rss.png
126 ms
ico-twitter.png
125 ms
ico-comments.png
128 ms
zevvle-announcement.png
129 ms
2019-spring-sale.jpg
216 ms
more-info-button.gif
160 ms
widget_fold.png
163 ms
bullet.png
162 ms
stars20.png
166 ms
star1-20.png
166 ms
star1-2-20.png
220 ms
star0-20.png
222 ms
wp-embed.min.js
207 ms
like.php
227 ms
plusone.js
35 ms
1f642.svg
24 ms
8mk_g2oP2fe.js
37 ms
FEppCFCt76d.png
35 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
17 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
48 ms
fastbutton
45 ms
postmessageRelay
67 ms
developers.google.com
378 ms
544727282-postmessagerelay.js
17 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
9 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
5 ms
mobilenetworkcomparison.org.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
mobilenetworkcomparison.org.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
mobilenetworkcomparison.org.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mobilenetworkcomparison.org.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Mobilenetworkcomparison.org.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mobilenetworkcomparison.org.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mobile Network Comparison. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: