Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 73% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    57% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

monitor.net.ru

Ремонт электроники и бытовой техники (форум Monitor)

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

582 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

125 ms

monitor.net.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Monitor content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about monitor.net.ru

Крупнейший сайт по ремонту электроники и бытовой техники (форум, советы и секреты ремонта, схемы, справочники)

Visit monitor.net.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Monitor.net.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 582 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

monitor.net.ru performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.4 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,370 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.057

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.0 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

monitor.net.ru

582 ms

index.css

238 ms

logo_pix_6color.gif

466 ms

asyncjs.php

592 ms

urchin.js

6 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 25% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Monitor.net.ru, 25% (4 requests) were made to Master-tv.com and 13% (2 requests) were made to Efind.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) relates to the external source Efbb.efind.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 20.8 kB (57%)

Content Size

36.5 kB

After Optimization

15.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Monitor.net.ru main page is 36.5 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 17.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 12.5 kB

  • Original 17.9 kB
  • After minification 17.8 kB
  • After compression 5.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.5 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3 B

  • Original 571 B
  • After minification 568 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Monitor images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 6.3 kB

  • Original 15.3 kB
  • After minification 15.3 kB
  • After compression 9.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 6.3 kB or 41% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 2.8 kB
  • After minification 2.6 kB
  • After compression 862 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Monitor.net.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.9 kB or 69% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (58%)

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Monitor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

monitor.net.ru accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

monitor.net.ru best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

monitor.net.ru SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1251

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Monitor.net.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Monitor.net.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Monitor. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: