1.1 sec in total
144 ms
709 ms
251 ms
Visit moonlighting.io now to see the best up-to-date Moonlighting content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about moonlighting.io
Awesome photo & video apps!
Visit moonlighting.ioWe analyzed Moonlighting.io page load time and found that the first response time was 144 ms and then it took 960 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
moonlighting.io performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
86/100
10%
Value17.6 s
0/100
25%
Value11.7 s
4/100
10%
Value160 ms
94/100
30%
Value0.374
28/100
15%
Value14.9 s
8/100
10%
144 ms
35 ms
69 ms
71 ms
77 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Moonlighting.io, 4% (2 requests) were made to Assets.moonlighting.io and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (346 ms) relates to the external source Connect.facebook.net.
Page size can be reduced by 679.7 kB (77%)
881.7 kB
202.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Moonlighting.io main page is 881.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 776.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 25.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.9 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Moonlighting needs image optimization as it can save up to 17.0 kB or 35% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 623.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 623.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Moonlighting.io needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.7 kB or 52% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (36%)
45
29
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Moonlighting. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
moonlighting.io
144 ms
normalize.css
35 ms
blueimp-gallery.min.css
69 ms
moonlighting_main.css
71 ms
moonlighting_response.css
77 ms
jquery.min.js
162 ms
jquery.blueimp-gallery.min.js
97 ms
require.js
145 ms
translate.js
286 ms
all.js
346 ms
profile_link
149 ms
ga.js
29 ms
moonlighting_logo@2x.png
112 ms
moonlighting_icons_superphoto_36x36.png
109 ms
moonlighting_icons_paintle_36x36.png
112 ms
moonlighting_icons_photomontager_36x36.png
109 ms
moonlighting_icons_photofacer_36x36.png
110 ms
moonlighting_icons_superbanner_36x36.png
111 ms
moonlighting_icons_action_36x36.png
111 ms
moonlighting_icons_pixanimator_36x36.png
111 ms
moonlighting_icons_supervideo_36x36.png
112 ms
moonlighting_icons_pixslider_36x36.png
117 ms
moonlighting_platforms_icons_android_white_30x30.png
118 ms
moonlighting_platforms_icons_apple_white_30x30.png
119 ms
moonlighting_platforms_icons_windows_white_30x30.png
118 ms
moonlighting_platforms_icons_web_white_30x30.png
118 ms
ml.png
120 ms
privacy.png
153 ms
search.png
153 ms
moonlighting_menu_icon.png
152 ms
loading.gif
226 ms
boot.js
149 ms
__utm.gif
43 ms
raleway-medium-webfont.svg
117 ms
raleway-regular-webfont.svg
78 ms
raleway-light-webfont.svg
214 ms
raleway-extralight-webfont.svg
132 ms
raleway-thin-webfont.svg
213 ms
raleway-semibold-webfont.svg
117 ms
raleway-bold-webfont.svg
211 ms
raleway-extrabold-webfont.svg
213 ms
raleway-heavy-webfont.svg
212 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
213 ms
OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.svg
213 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.svg
212 ms
collect
75 ms
raleway-medium-webfont.svg
194 ms
jquery.min.js
61 ms
moonlighting.io accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
moonlighting.io best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
moonlighting.io SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Moonlighting.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Moonlighting.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
moonlighting.io
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Moonlighting. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: