5.8 sec in total
686 ms
4.9 sec
189 ms
Welcome to moor.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Moor best content right away, or after learning these important things about moor.co.uk
The global leader in innovative products for tissue blood flow and oxygen assessments using laser Doppler and laser speckle contrast imaging
Visit moor.co.ukWe analyzed Moor.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 686 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
moor.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
17/100
10%
Value28.6 s
0/100
25%
Value12.9 s
2/100
10%
Value2,300 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.019
100/100
15%
Value20.3 s
2/100
10%
686 ms
198 ms
204 ms
7 ms
202 ms
Our browser made a total of 107 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Moor.co.uk, 11% (12 requests) were made to W.sharethis.com and 7% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) relates to the external source Us.moor.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 527.8 kB (9%)
5.6 MB
5.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Moor.co.uk main page is 5.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.0 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 63.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Moor images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 319.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 319.4 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 111.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Moor.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 111.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (56%)
100
44
The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Moor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
us.moor.co.uk
686 ms
screen.min.css
198 ms
threesixty.css
204 ms
font-awesome.min.css
7 ms
bootstrap-select.min.css
202 ms
jquery.min.js
29 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
44 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
244 ms
jquery.lightbox-0.5.min.js
242 ms
buttons.js
11 ms
loader.js
11 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
265 ms
jquery.dotdotdot.js
392 ms
functions.min.js
247 ms
trackingCode.js
82 ms
analytics.js
37 ms
logo.gif
234 ms
logo.png
234 ms
menu.png
235 ms
au.png
236 ms
ca.png
341 ms
cn.png
409 ms
de.png
418 ms
gb.png
417 ms
ru.png
417 ms
us.png
418 ms
pubMed.gif
542 ms
searchglass.png
592 ms
2_xl.png
1357 ms
_xl.jpg
973 ms
5_xl.png
1073 ms
19_xl.jpg
2416 ms
1_xl.png
1405 ms
4_xl.png
878 ms
nextarrow.png
1080 ms
facebook.png
1166 ms
twitter.png
1274 ms
youtube.png
1279 ms
linkedin.png
1371 ms
navDropBG.jpg
50 ms
505_m.jpg
1551 ms
508_m.png
1556 ms
545_m.png
1827 ms
525_m.png
1628 ms
footerBG.png
1584 ms
collect
14 ms
AvenirNextLTPro%20Regular.otf
1887 ms
f6ebea36-fb7c-4458-a43e-2112c48c17e4.woff
1810 ms
3a42a252-67ff-4186-88cf-762f56719ca1.woff
1825 ms
AvenirNextLTPro%20Medium.otf
1974 ms
0417e965-6ae1-4395-8f71-f61ea767d523.woff
2078 ms
AvenirNextLTPro%20Bold.otf
2206 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
5 ms
plusone.js
155 ms
include.js
183 ms
getAllAppDefault.esi
112 ms
51a56502-44d2-4d70-808f-fc822da45209.woff
1964 ms
logoBall.png
1929 ms
bx_loader.gif
2015 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
11 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
31 ms
fastbutton
121 ms
ondomload.min.js
2098 ms
postmessageRelay
36 ms
gateway1.whoson.com
177 ms
invite.js
178 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
76 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
59 ms
getSegment.php
185 ms
checkOAuth.esi
54 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
48 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
30 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
58 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
20 ms
t.dhj
7 ms
t.dhj
9 ms
hoverbuttons.6eab8de2ee93b309873157b6d3f977fe.css
8 ms
hoverbuttons.035267d71d894482eb413e5bea488ff5.js
12 ms
cm
24 ms
x35248
107 ms
s-3271.xgi
15 ms
hbpix
37 ms
8 ms
xrefid.xgi
13 ms
9 ms
pixel
16 ms
2981
31 ms
index.2d85e55d89f85ae69e4f2ca5ab9438b7.html
16 ms
buttons.ab966a004186897711de4a5ed256c924.css
23 ms
stcommon.2b05accc08f1ee42fe1983647ab923ea.js
21 ms
st.1188278743c14064d5e8ae56c8ada29c.js
8 ms
poll.gif
90 ms
css3.css
102 ms
print.min.css
102 ms
ga.js
8 ms
mini_Top_Cap_R.png
8 ms
facebook_32.png
7 ms
mini_BG_R.png
6 ms
mini_Bottom_Cap_R.png
6 ms
twitter_32.png
6 ms
googleplus_32.png
7 ms
linkedin_32.png
38 ms
xing_32.png
33 ms
baidu_32.png
35 ms
email_32.png
34 ms
sharethis_32.png
33 ms
__utm.gif
8 ms
moor.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
moor.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
moor.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Moor.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Moor.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
moor.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Moor. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: