Tools & Wizards About Us
moorpark.org.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 69% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

moorpark.org.uk

Moor Park Day and Boarding Catholic Prep School Ludlow

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

777 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

313 ms

moorpark.org.uk screenshot

About Website

Welcome to moorpark.org.uk homepage info - get ready to check Moor Park best content right away, or after learning these important things about moorpark.org.uk

Co-educational Independent Day and Boarding Shropshire Prep School

Visit moorpark.org.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Moorpark.org.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 777 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

moorpark.org.uk performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value34.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,540 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.01

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value45.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

moorpark.org.uk

777 ms

mootools1.2.4.js

750 ms

scripts

465 ms

_reset.css

154 ms

styles

507 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Moorpark.org.uk, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (777 ms) belongs to the original domain Moorpark.org.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 205.5 kB (23%)

Content Size

893.5 kB

After Optimization

688.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Moorpark.org.uk main page is 893.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 627.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 18.7 kB

  • Original 24.0 kB
  • After minification 22.6 kB
  • After compression 5.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.7 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 22.7 kB

  • Original 627.4 kB
  • After minification 604.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Moor Park images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 151.0 kB

  • Original 225.9 kB
  • After minification 224.6 kB
  • After compression 74.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 151.0 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 13.0 kB

  • Original 16.2 kB
  • After minification 14.9 kB
  • After compression 3.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Moorpark.org.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.0 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

30

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Moor Park. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

moorpark.org.uk

moorpark.org.uk

777 ms

mootools1.2.4.js

mootools1.2.4.js

750 ms

scripts

scripts

465 ms

_reset.css

_reset.css

154 ms

styles

styles

507 ms

background.jpg

background.jpg

599 ms

bg-shadow.png

bg-shadow.png

153 ms

headerbg.jpg

headerbg.jpg

226 ms

shortlist.png

shortlist.png

301 ms

green-grad.jpg

green-grad.jpg

152 ms

news-bg.gif

news-bg.gif

79 ms

562 ms

366 ms

502 ms

slide1.jpg

slide1.jpg

374 ms

b1.jpg

b1.jpg

374 ms

slide2.jpg

slide2.jpg

440 ms

b2.jpg

b2.jpg

448 ms

slide3.jpg

slide3.jpg

523 ms

b3.jpg

b3.jpg

514 ms

slide4.jpg

slide4.jpg

596 ms

b4.jpg

b4.jpg

576 ms

slide5.jpg

slide5.jpg

589 ms

b5.jpg

b5.jpg

597 ms

slide6.jpg

slide6.jpg

633 ms

b6.jpg

b6.jpg

650 ms

facebook_35.png

facebook_35.png

663 ms

twitter_35.png

twitter_35.png

667 ms

youtube.png

youtube.png

669 ms

ga.js

ga.js

6 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

11 ms

Accessibility Review

moorpark.org.uk accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

moorpark.org.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

moorpark.org.uk SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Moorpark.org.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Moorpark.org.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

moorpark.org.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Moor Park. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: