12.8 sec in total
200 ms
12.5 sec
152 ms
Visit mopet.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Mopet content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mopet.co.uk
No more lost pet!
Visit mopet.co.ukWe analyzed Mopet.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 200 ms and then it took 12.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
mopet.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
88/100
10%
Value2.7 s
86/100
25%
Value2.0 s
99/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value2.7 s
97/100
10%
200 ms
10738 ms
191 ms
54 ms
68 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Mopet.co.uk, 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (10.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Mopet.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 447.5 kB (67%)
665.2 kB
217.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Mopet.co.uk main page is 665.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 326.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.5 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.5 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Mopet needs image optimization as it can save up to 16.0 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 140.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 140.0 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 274.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mopet.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 274.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (65%)
51
18
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mopet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
mopet.co.uk
200 ms
www.mopet.co.uk
10738 ms
language-selector.css
191 ms
css
54 ms
css
68 ms
style.css
360 ms
datepicker.css
272 ms
bootstrap.min.css
572 ms
fblb.css
482 ms
lionbars.css
300 ms
navigation.css
286 ms
cms-navigation-base.css
373 ms
cms-navigation.css
374 ms
estilos.css
405 ms
font-awesome.min.css
539 ms
pac.css
477 ms
layout.css
471 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
595 ms
woocommerce.css
657 ms
ajax.css
579 ms
font-awesome.min.css
585 ms
lightbox.min.css
627 ms
jquery.js
766 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
673 ms
userscripts.js
681 ms
jquery.lionbars.0.3.min.js
685 ms
principal.js
717 ms
wp-ajax-response.min.js
752 ms
ajax.js
762 ms
bootstrap.min.js
790 ms
scripts.js
789 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.js
812 ms
easing.js
845 ms
grid.js
943 ms
sitepress.js
859 ms
ga.js
84 ms
en.png
105 ms
header-logo.png
103 ms
meperdi.png
124 ms
huella-boton.png
122 ms
shadow.png
125 ms
arrow.png
103 ms
back.jpg
277 ms
paso1en.gif
201 ms
paso2en.gif
194 ms
paso3en.gif
201 ms
perrohuellitas.jpg
202 ms
facebook.png
215 ms
twitter.png
287 ms
bt_googleplay.jpg
295 ms
bt_appstore.jpg
315 ms
DsLzC9scoPnrGiwYYMQXpkpeNX8RPf6i6WQfJWyCWEs.ttf
76 ms
M__Wu4PAmHf4YZvQM8tWsDnFfol0SnfBMmbnmUK0fZM.ttf
82 ms
CA1k7SlXcY5kvI81M_R28Y7PgI6IeGWgqdOlp0TQlJM.ttf
88 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
289 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
490 ms
__utm.gif
32 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
99 ms
mopet.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
mopet.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
mopet.co.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mopet.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mopet.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mopet.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mopet. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: