Tools & Wizards About Us
moptions.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 95

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

moptions.com

Marketing Options, B2B Industrial Marketing, Design, Website, Virtual Reality and Consulting

Page Load Speed

8.8 sec in total

First Response

28 ms

Resources Loaded

8.5 sec

Page Rendered

256 ms

moptions.com screenshot

About Website

Visit moptions.com now to see the best up-to-date M Options content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about moptions.com

Marketing Options offers complete B2B industrial marketing services including web design, Virtual Reality, marketing research, marketing plans, advertising services, public relations, media services, ...

Visit moptions.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Moptions.com page load time and found that the first response time was 28 ms and then it took 8.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

moptions.com performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

72/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.9 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value490 ms

58/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.355

31/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.9 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

moptions.com

28 ms

moptions.com

244 ms

gtm.js

69 ms

main.css

216 ms

style.css

223 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Moptions.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Linkedin.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Platform.linkedin.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.6 sec) relates to the external source Track.moptions.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 106.4 kB (5%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Moptions.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 34.6 kB

  • Original 43.2 kB
  • After minification 42.0 kB
  • After compression 8.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.6 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. M Options images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 22.4 kB

  • Original 455.2 kB
  • After minification 455.1 kB
  • After compression 432.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 44.4 kB

  • Original 60.3 kB
  • After minification 15.9 kB
  • After compression 15.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Moptions.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 44.4 kB or 74% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (57%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of M Options. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

moptions.com

moptions.com

28 ms

moptions.com

moptions.com

244 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

69 ms

main.css

main.css

216 ms

style.css

style.css

223 ms

jquery-1.4.4.min.js

jquery-1.4.4.min.js

224 ms

jquery.reveal.js

jquery.reveal.js

207 ms

in.js

in.js

27 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

54 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

222 ms

jquery.dropotron.min.js

jquery.dropotron.min.js

250 ms

jquery.slidertron.min.js

jquery.slidertron.min.js

397 ms

skel.min.js

skel.min.js

406 ms

skel-viewport.min.js

skel-viewport.min.js

417 ms

util.js

util.js

398 ms

main.js

main.js

409 ms

iframe-size.js

iframe-size.js

447 ms

wowslider.js

wowslider.js

685 ms

script.js

script.js

683 ms

css

css

32 ms

css

css

116 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

385 ms

ss.js

ss.js

280 ms

a.z

a.z

7635 ms

MO-2C_Logo.png

MO-2C_Logo.png

271 ms

HEADERS-01-3.jpg

HEADERS-01-3.jpg

273 ms

HEADERS-02-3.jpg

HEADERS-02-3.jpg

274 ms

HEADERS-03-3.jpg

HEADERS-03-3.jpg

276 ms

HEADERS-04-3.jpg

HEADERS-04-3.jpg

273 ms

HEADERS-05-3.jpg

HEADERS-05-3.jpg

274 ms

HEADERS-06-3.jpg

HEADERS-06-3.jpg

422 ms

HEADERS-07-3.jpg

HEADERS-07-3.jpg

448 ms

HEADERS-08-3.jpg

HEADERS-08-3.jpg

445 ms

SS-19_500x403.jpg

SS-19_500x403.jpg

443 ms

Palmer-new.jpg

Palmer-new.jpg

334 ms

PALMER_TOUCHSCREEN_HOME_NEW.jpg

PALMER_TOUCHSCREEN_HOME_NEW.jpg

472 ms

MO_StanChem_SM.jpg

MO_StanChem_SM.jpg

539 ms

Palmer_logo.png

Palmer_logo.png

639 ms

bg01.png

bg01.png

570 ms

5aU69_a8oxmIdGl4AQ.ttf

5aU69_a8oxmIdGl4AQ.ttf

150 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

150 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

614 ms

ga.js

ga.js

104 ms

hotjar-533520.js

hotjar-533520.js

174 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

33 ms

FollowCompany.js

FollowCompany.js

122 ms

koi

koi

262 ms

FollowCompany

FollowCompany

1 ms

FollowCompany

FollowCompany

90 ms

yphvzyaa3l2f40faxn7h79ap

yphvzyaa3l2f40faxn7h79ap

21 ms

in.js

in.js

14 ms

cwphtfsvdwm4k6n91alllgs6q

cwphtfsvdwm4k6n91alllgs6q

73 ms

Accessibility Review

moptions.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

moptions.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

moptions.com SEO score

95

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Moptions.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Moptions.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

moptions.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of M Options. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: