Tools & Wizards About Us
movingcompany.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 53

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    43% of websites

movingcompany.com

Find Local Moving Companies Instantly - Moving Company.com

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

134 ms

Resources Loaded

911 ms

Page Rendered

239 ms

movingcompany.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Moving Company content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about movingcompany.com

Free searchable directory of Moving services available when you need them. Locate Long Distance Moving, Local Moving in your area or your GPS location, instantly.

Visit movingcompany.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Movingcompany.com page load time and found that the first response time was 134 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

movingcompany.com performance score

53

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

23/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.2 s

77/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value560 ms

52/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.017

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.6 s

69/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

movingcompany.com

134 ms

movingcompany.com

29 ms

www.movingcompany.com

143 ms

bootstrap.min.css

156 ms

fontawesome-all.min.css

245 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Movingcompany.com, 19% (8 requests) were made to Movingcompany.azureedge.net and 12% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (245 ms) relates to the external source Movingcompany.azureedge.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 47.6 kB (5%)

Content Size

950.2 kB

After Optimization

902.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Movingcompany.com main page is 950.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 819.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 31.3 kB

  • Original 37.5 kB
  • After minification 26.5 kB
  • After compression 6.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.0 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 7.9 kB

  • Original 819.6 kB
  • After minification 811.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Moving Company images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 8.4 kB

  • Original 59.9 kB
  • After minification 59.9 kB
  • After compression 51.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 8.4 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 54 B

  • Original 33.2 kB
  • After minification 33.2 kB
  • After compression 33.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Movingcompany.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (43%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Moving Company. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

movingcompany.com

movingcompany.com

134 ms

movingcompany.com

movingcompany.com

29 ms

www.movingcompany.com

www.movingcompany.com

143 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

156 ms

fontawesome-all.min.css

fontawesome-all.min.css

245 ms

aos.css

aos.css

138 ms

select2.min.css

select2.min.css

111 ms

logo.png

logo.png

224 ms

ProgressBar.gif

ProgressBar.gif

237 ms

mickey-mouse.png

mickey-mouse.png

237 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

232 ms

sharethis.js

sharethis.js

129 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

216 ms

aos.js

aos.js

125 ms

select2.full.min.js

select2.full.min.js

127 ms

gallery1.png

gallery1.png

95 ms

gallery2.png

gallery2.png

127 ms

gallery3.png

gallery3.png

124 ms

aos.css

aos.css

11 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

27 ms

style.css

style.css

15 ms

css

css

37 ms

css

css

56 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

17 ms

logo.png

logo.png

14 ms

ProgressBar.gif

ProgressBar.gif

7 ms

fontawesome-all.min.css

fontawesome-all.min.css

12 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

132 ms

mickey-mouse.png

mickey-mouse.png

22 ms

banner.jpg

banner.jpg

200 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

89 ms

banner.jpg

banner.jpg

76 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

110 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

110 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

123 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

67 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

66 ms

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkP8o58a-xw.ttf

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkP8o58a-xw.ttf

123 ms

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkM0o58a-xw.ttf

6xK-dSZaM9iE8KbpRA_LJ3z8mH9BOJvgkM0o58a-xw.ttf

130 ms

collect

collect

39 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

22 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

22 ms

Accessibility Review

movingcompany.com accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

movingcompany.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Requests the geolocation permission on page load

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

movingcompany.com SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Movingcompany.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Movingcompany.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

movingcompany.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Moving Company. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: