Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 82% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

movingfeedback.com

Moving Feedback | Expert Comparisons of Moving Companies

Page Load Speed

5.4 sec in total

First Response

68 ms

Resources Loaded

4.8 sec

Page Rendered

552 ms

movingfeedback.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Moving Feedback content for Pakistan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about movingfeedback.com

Find your perfect match. Moving Feedback's expert comparisons help you choose the best moving company based on price, services, and reviews.

Visit movingfeedback.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Movingfeedback.com page load time and found that the first response time was 68 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

movingfeedback.com performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.7 s

25/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value510 ms

57/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.041

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.7 s

36/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

movingfeedback.com

68 ms

www.movingfeedback.com

2231 ms

42f57d595e6c195c5dd33f9184b4427b.js

48 ms

frontend.min.css

9 ms

stylesheet.min.css

18 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Movingfeedback.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Ob.du89buildings.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Static.cloudflareinsights.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Movingfeedback.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 122.0 kB (43%)

Content Size

282.2 kB

After Optimization

160.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Movingfeedback.com main page is 282.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 141.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 120.5 kB

  • Original 141.8 kB
  • After minification 101.2 kB
  • After compression 21.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 40.6 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 120.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 28.6 kB
  • After minification 27.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Moving Feedback images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 30 B

  • Original 68.0 kB
  • After minification 68.0 kB
  • After compression 68.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 459 B

  • Original 43.8 kB
  • After minification 43.8 kB
  • After compression 43.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Movingfeedback.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (27%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

35

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Moving Feedback. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

movingfeedback.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

movingfeedback.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

movingfeedback.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Movingfeedback.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Movingfeedback.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Moving Feedback. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: