Tools & Wizards About Us
mpy.eu screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 33

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    26% of websites

mpy.eu

Mikkelin Puhelin Oyj

Page Load Speed

10.7 sec in total

First Response

313 ms

Resources Loaded

9.8 sec

Page Rendered

582 ms

mpy.eu screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Mpy content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mpy.eu

Mikkelin Puhelin Oyj

Visit mpy.eu

Key Findings

We analyzed Mpy.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 313 ms and then it took 10.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mpy.eu performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.125

83/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mpy.eu

313 ms

www.mpy.fi

453 ms

mpy.fi

698 ms

gtm.js

72 ms

uc.js

40 ms

Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Mpy.eu, 65% (50 requests) were made to Mpy.fi and 22% (17 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Mpy.fi.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (14%)

Content Size

7.9 MB

After Optimization

6.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mpy.eu main page is 7.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 7.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 2.5 kB
  • After minification 723 B
  • After compression 438 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.8 kB, which is 71% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 1.0 MB

  • Original 7.7 MB
  • After minification 6.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Mpy needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 87.9 kB

  • Original 156.9 kB
  • After minification 156.9 kB
  • After compression 69.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 87.9 kB or 56% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 5 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (67%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mpy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

mpy.eu

mpy.eu

313 ms

www.mpy.fi

www.mpy.fi

453 ms

mpy.fi

mpy.fi

698 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

72 ms

uc.js

uc.js

40 ms

formidableforms1.css

formidableforms1.css

462 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

698 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

357 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

820 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

478 ms

style.css

style.css

359 ms

style.css

style.css

709 ms

language-cookie.js

language-cookie.js

486 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

587 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

604 ms

dynamic.js

dynamic.js

273 ms

ws-tracking.js

ws-tracking.js

35 ms

topbar-1.css

topbar-1.css

502 ms

navigation-1.css

navigation-1.css

603 ms

search-1.css

search-1.css

620 ms

banner-2.css

banner-2.css

628 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

717 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

719 ms

content_highlights.css

content_highlights.css

727 ms

content_carousel.css

content_carousel.css

763 ms

button_group.css

button_group.css

763 ms

image.css

image.css

867 ms

footer-4.css

footer-4.css

865 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

873 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

873 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

918 ms

particles.min.js

particles.min.js

997 ms

content_carousel.js

content_carousel.js

965 ms

lst3brl.css

lst3brl.css

120 ms

p.css

p.css

24 ms

matomo.js

matomo.js

759 ms

MPY_orange.png

MPY_orange.png

208 ms

MPY_etusivunkuva_1920x640.jpg

MPY_etusivunkuva_1920x640.jpg

672 ms

MPY_etusivun_ihmiset_1920x640.png

MPY_etusivun_ihmiset_1920x640.png

624 ms

ikoni_tietoliikenne-2.png

ikoni_tietoliikenne-2.png

242 ms

Tv_Viihde2_2.png

Tv_Viihde2_2.png

530 ms

Asennus-ja-opastus.png

Asennus-ja-opastus.png

530 ms

fi.png

fi.png

621 ms

search.svg

search.svg

610 ms

d

d

85 ms

d

d

94 ms

d

d

141 ms

d

d

150 ms

d

d

94 ms

d

d

91 ms

d

d

91 ms

d

d

94 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

648 ms

MPY_Viihde_digi_hero1_1920x640-600x400.png

MPY_Viihde_digi_hero1_1920x640-600x400.png

684 ms

arrow-white.png

arrow-white.png

637 ms

Kuidunkaivajat_1200x628-1020x628.png

Kuidunkaivajat_1200x628-1020x628.png

1274 ms

MPY_etusivun_ihmiset_1920x640-1020x640.png

MPY_etusivun_ihmiset_1920x640-1020x640.png

1096 ms

MPY-jatkaa-vahvalla-kasvupolullaan_Janne-Kokrhonen_1200x630-1020x630.png

MPY-jatkaa-vahvalla-kasvupolullaan_Janne-Kokrhonen_1200x630-1020x630.png

1076 ms

MPY_Mikkeli_2022-1302-1020x680.jpg

MPY_Mikkeli_2022-1302-1020x680.jpg

764 ms

arrow-orange.png

arrow-orange.png

744 ms

MPY_rekry_digi_1920x1080.png

MPY_rekry_digi_1920x1080.png

980 ms

d

d

101 ms

d

d

102 ms

d

d

107 ms

d

d

101 ms

d

d

106 ms

d

d

114 ms

d

d

567 ms

d

d

106 ms

Taloyhtiot.jpg

Taloyhtiot.jpg

845 ms

YP_tarjooma_kansi2-scaled.jpg

YP_tarjooma_kansi2-scaled.jpg

834 ms

phoneicon.png

phoneicon.png

921 ms

mailicon.png

mailicon.png

922 ms

particlesjs-config.json

particlesjs-config.json

911 ms

matomo.php

matomo.php

202 ms

configs.php

configs.php

303 ms

hywydbWA

hywydbWA

408 ms

Accessibility Review

mpy.eu accessibility score

33

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

mpy.eu best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

mpy.eu SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mpy.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Mpy.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

mpy.eu

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mpy. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: