Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

musesleep.com

Cooling Memory foam mattress for better sleep – Muse Sleep

Page Load Speed

6.1 sec in total

First Response

117 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

4.7 sec

musesleep.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Muse Sleep content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about musesleep.com

Sleep inspired with a cooling memory foam mattress in a box designed with you in mind. Every detail of a Muse mattress is meticulously crafted to give you a cool, comfortable night’s sleep. Our goal i...

Visit musesleep.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Musesleep.com page load time and found that the first response time was 117 ms and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

musesleep.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.7 s

25/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,360 ms

17/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.8 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

musesleep.com

117 ms

musesleep.com

430 ms

css-vars-ponyfill@2

92 ms

icon

96 ms

load_feature-ab38017af3cf759db0af0bbd1e75229f6a189f5bf1f2db42169630998b969021.js

75 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Musesleep.com, 43% (24 requests) were made to Cdn.shopify.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Pixel-geo.prfct.co. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (430 ms) belongs to the original domain Musesleep.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 120.9 kB (58%)

Content Size

207.4 kB

After Optimization

86.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Musesleep.com main page is 207.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 154.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 120.2 kB

  • Original 154.2 kB
  • After minification 148.4 kB
  • After compression 34.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 120.2 kB or 78% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 659 B

  • Original 53.2 kB
  • After minification 53.1 kB
  • After compression 52.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (78%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Muse Sleep. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

musesleep.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

SEO Factors

musesleep.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Musesleep.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Musesleep.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: