Tools & Wizards About Us
musicfplus.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 37

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

musicfplus.com

2138太阳集团app_2138com手机版

Page Load Speed

36.7 sec in total

First Response

1.4 sec

Resources Loaded

35 sec

Page Rendered

360 ms

musicfplus.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Musicfplus content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about musicfplus.com

Visit musicfplus.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Musicfplus.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 35.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 14 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

musicfplus.com performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

49/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.1 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.21

59/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.1 s

63/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

musicfplus.com

1364 ms

style.css

1169 ms

lrtk.css

716 ms

jquery.smooth-scroll.js

716 ms

jquery-2.0.3.min.js

3700 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Musicfplus.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Musicfplus.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 5.3 kB (69%)

Content Size

7.6 kB

After Optimization

2.3 kB

  • HTML

In fact, the total size of Musicfplus.com main page is 7.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 7.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 5.3 kB

  • Original 7.6 kB
  • After minification 6.3 kB
  • After compression 2.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.3 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.3 kB or 69% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (40%)

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Musicfplus. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

musicfplus.com

musicfplus.com

1364 ms

style.css

style.css

1169 ms

lrtk.css

lrtk.css

716 ms

jquery.smooth-scroll.js

jquery.smooth-scroll.js

716 ms

jquery-2.0.3.min.js

jquery-2.0.3.min.js

3700 ms

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

3733 ms

koala.min.1.5.js

koala.min.1.5.js

13098 ms

terminator2.2.min.js

terminator2.2.min.js

2033 ms

logo.png

logo.png

17083 ms

06.png

06.png

19783 ms

ych05.jpg

ych05.jpg

19783 ms

ych06.jpg

ych06.jpg

19784 ms

focus_btn.png

focus_btn.png

335 ms

ych3.jpg

ych3.jpg

12333 ms

ych4.jpg

ych4.jpg

5077 ms

ych5.jpg

ych5.jpg

19782 ms

ych6.jpg

ych6.jpg

19782 ms

yy1.jpg

yy1.jpg

19782 ms

yy2.png

yy2.png

19782 ms

yy3.jpg

yy3.jpg

19783 ms

yy4.jpg

yy4.jpg

19782 ms

lw1.jpg

lw1.jpg

19782 ms

lw2.jpg

lw2.jpg

19781 ms

lw3.jpg

lw3.jpg

19782 ms

lw4.jpg

lw4.jpg

19781 ms

GandhiSans-Regular-webfont.woff

GandhiSans-Regular-webfont.woff

19691 ms

GandhiSans-Regular-webfont.ttf

GandhiSans-Regular-webfont.ttf

607 ms

Accessibility Review

musicfplus.com accessibility score

37

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

musicfplus.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

musicfplus.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Musicfplus.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Musicfplus.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

musicfplus.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Musicfplus. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: