4 sec in total
127 ms
3.4 sec
517 ms
Welcome to muslimpairs.com homepage info - get ready to check Muslimpairs best content right away, or after learning these important things about muslimpairs.com
Premium landing page for Lovers
Visit muslimpairs.comWe analyzed Muslimpairs.com page load time and found that the first response time was 127 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
muslimpairs.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.5 s
95/100
10%
Value6.2 s
11/100
25%
Value2.8 s
96/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.022
100/100
15%
Value2.7 s
97/100
10%
127 ms
492 ms
169 ms
397 ms
238 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Muslimpairs.com, 83% (60 requests) were made to Lookingtowed.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Lookingtowed.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (42%)
3.5 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Muslimpairs.com main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 57.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 23.3 kB, which is 36% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.1 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 112.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Muslimpairs images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 994.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 994.1 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 313.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Muslimpairs.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 313.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (63%)
64
24
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Muslimpairs. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
muslimpairs.com
127 ms
lookingtowed.com
492 ms
templatemo_main.css
169 ms
foundation.css
397 ms
font-awesome.min.css
238 ms
prettyPhoto.css
241 ms
app.css
243 ms
updates.css
380 ms
bootstrap-select.css
319 ms
custom.css
402 ms
dashboard.css
404 ms
css
24 ms
css
37 ms
modernizr.foundation.js
404 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
410 ms
owl.theme.green.min.css
472 ms
jquery.js
879 ms
foundation.min.js
729 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.0-packed.js
492 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
410 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
491 ms
jquery.transit.min.js
550 ms
jquery.ba-throttle-debounce.min.js
568 ms
retina.js
650 ms
jquery.knob.js
727 ms
twitterfeed-ap.js
706 ms
jquery.fittext.js
727 ms
jquery.quovolver.js
806 ms
jquery.backgroundSize.js
862 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
961 ms
jquery.validate.js
1001 ms
jquery-ui.css
15 ms
jquery-ui.js
12 ms
app.js
884 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1044 ms
Chart.min.js
1173 ms
templatemo_script.js
1029 ms
shieldui-all.min.css
1121 ms
shieldui-all.min.js
1802 ms
bootstrap-select.js
1312 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1300 ms
css
16 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1428 ms
bg-body.gif
246 ms
handmadepaper.png
246 ms
dark_dotted2.png
245 ms
header_image_bg.png
246 ms
logo.png
247 ms
BG1.png
320 ms
facebook-signup-button-24.png
318 ms
wedding.jpg
871 ms
1443092418.PNG
882 ms
1446815006.jpg
532 ms
1446817979.jpg
652 ms
1446821484.jpg
625 ms
1446816174.jpg
707 ms
1446834400.PNG
1178 ms
sponsor1.jpg
860 ms
sponsor2.jpg
810 ms
Google-Adsense1.jpg
942 ms
gray_pattern.gif
895 ms
map-bg.png
946 ms
black_pattern.gif
953 ms
up_page.png
964 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
164 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
164 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
164 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
164 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1180 ms
Y-2_3oNnGXTRT4ySJQfhEBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
70 ms
ga.js
28 ms
loading_dark.gif
647 ms
muslimpairs.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
muslimpairs.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
muslimpairs.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Muslimpairs.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Muslimpairs.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
muslimpairs.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Muslimpairs. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: