2.4 sec in total
3 ms
2.1 sec
297 ms
Click here to check amazing Myfeed content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about myfeed.com
Visit myfeed.comWe analyzed Myfeed.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
myfeed.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.0 s
100/100
10%
Value1.0 s
100/100
25%
Value1.0 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value1.0 s
100/100
10%
3 ms
672 ms
30 ms
148 ms
33 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Myfeed.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (672 ms) relates to the external source Enaming.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (64%)
1.8 MB
643.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Myfeed.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 937.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.2 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Myfeed needs image optimization as it can save up to 42.0 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 624.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 624.7 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 389.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Myfeed.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 389.9 kB or 72% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (79%)
66
14
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Myfeed. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
3 ms
672 ms
style.css
30 ms
jquery.min.js
148 ms
style.css
33 ms
style-ribbons.css
53 ms
ParaAdmin.css
54 ms
style.css
74 ms
cache.skin.css
94 ms
mp-stacks-style.css
94 ms
lightbox.css
100 ms
styles.css
100 ms
bootstrap.min.css
139 ms
styles.css
97 ms
jquery.accordion.css
125 ms
tmm_custom_style.min.css
124 ms
css
307 ms
icomoon.css
142 ms
font-awesome.css
139 ms
font-awesome.min.css
140 ms
default.min.css
144 ms
jquery.js
151 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
144 ms
scripts.js
145 ms
jquery.tablednd.js
151 ms
jquery.dragtable.js
151 ms
jscolor.js
157 ms
ParaAdmin.js
156 ms
scripts.js
156 ms
jquery.accordion.js
163 ms
easy-columns.css
163 ms
frontend.css
149 ms
frontend.js
149 ms
addthis_widget.js
145 ms
output.css
150 ms
jquery.form.min.js
150 ms
elementQuery.min.js
152 ms
lightbox.js
154 ms
mp-stacks-front-end.js
154 ms
scripts.js
154 ms
api.js
141 ms
reset.css
154 ms
wp.css
150 ms
post-content.css
151 ms
menu_functions.js
256 ms
wp-embed.min.js
252 ms
functions.js
236 ms
ga.js
202 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
175 ms
analytics.js
211 ms
logo-enaming.png
51 ms
image-page-header.jpg
54 ms
8fd0aa836412853f9fd25e4cd662b1b4.jpg
51 ms
573 ms
sprite.png
148 ms
recaptcha__en.js
454 ms
ajax-loader.gif
363 ms
oDShYVLKr2BTVkQewdDISfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.woff
427 ms
b1OWH1QXUjVxHio22EJrRQ.woff
522 ms
fj4GB2RX6COD1Mnz53LyUA.woff
522 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
361 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
362 ms
icomoon.svg
419 ms
__utm.gif
262 ms
collect
70 ms
anchor
105 ms
styles__ltr.css
36 ms
s5G5viF55Zd620FDUE2o6cwnsrT1pToaK6kVmkloWvE.js
16 ms
webworker.js
20 ms
logo_48.png
12 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
13 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
13 ms
300lo.json
113 ms
recaptcha__en.js
17 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
58 ms
myfeed.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
myfeed.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
myfeed.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Myfeed.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Myfeed.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
myfeed.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Myfeed. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: