Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 75% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

naem.org

NAEM - The National Association for EHS&S Management

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

172 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

211 ms

naem.org screenshot

About Website

Visit naem.org now to see the best up-to-date NAEM content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about naem.org

NAEM empowers corporate EHS leaders to advance environmental stewardship, create safe and healthy workplaces, and promote global sustainability.

Visit naem.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Naem.org page load time and found that the first response time was 172 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

naem.org performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.9 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,680 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.136

80/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.3 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

naem.org

172 ms

www.naem.org

774 ms

naem.css

287 ms

combined.css

202 ms

container.css

21 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 36% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Naem.org, 16% (8 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 14% (7 requests) were made to Ymcss.naem.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (774 ms) belongs to the original domain Naem.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 164.8 kB (31%)

Content Size

526.8 kB

After Optimization

362.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Naem.org main page is 526.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 269.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 24.7 kB

  • Original 31.4 kB
  • After minification 28.5 kB
  • After compression 6.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.7 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 13.4 kB

  • Original 269.1 kB
  • After minification 255.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. NAEM images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 91.5 kB

  • Original 183.9 kB
  • After minification 163.0 kB
  • After compression 92.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 91.5 kB or 50% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 35.3 kB

  • Original 42.5 kB
  • After minification 34.5 kB
  • After compression 7.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Naem.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 35.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (60%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

19

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of NAEM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

naem.org accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

naem.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

naem.org SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Naem.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Naem.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of NAEM. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: