Tools & Wizards About Us
naftema.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 56

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 24% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

naftema.com

نفت ما | آژانس رویدادهای مهم نفت و انرژی

Page Load Speed

21.8 sec in total

First Response

521 ms

Resources Loaded

20.1 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

naftema.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Naftema content for Iran. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about naftema.com

انتشار رویدادهای داخلی و بین المللی مهم نفت و گاز و انرژی، پالایش و پتروشيمی، همچنين انرژی های نو و محیط زیست

Visit naftema.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Naftema.com page load time and found that the first response time was 521 ms and then it took 21.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

naftema.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.3 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value290 ms

79/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.19

65/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

naftema.com

521 ms

naftema.com

687 ms

www.naftema.com

1190 ms

js

46 ms

709 ms

Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (99 requests) were addressed to the original Naftema.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Trustseal.e-rasaneh.ir and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (14.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Naftema.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 742.9 kB (16%)

Content Size

4.6 MB

After Optimization

3.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Naftema.com main page is 4.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 126.8 kB

  • Original 157.4 kB
  • After minification 154.1 kB
  • After compression 30.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 126.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 605.6 kB

  • Original 4.3 MB
  • After minification 3.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Naftema needs image optimization as it can save up to 605.6 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 205 B

  • Original 28.9 kB
  • After minification 28.9 kB
  • After compression 28.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 10.3 kB

  • Original 75.1 kB
  • After minification 75.1 kB
  • After compression 64.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Naftema.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.3 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (5%)

Requests Now

98

After Optimization

93

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 98 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Naftema. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

naftema.com

naftema.com

521 ms

naftema.com

naftema.com

687 ms

www.naftema.com

www.naftema.com

1190 ms

js

js

46 ms

709 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

681 ms

bootstrap-rtl.css

bootstrap-rtl.css

525 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

528 ms

ch01_fa_style.css

ch01_fa_style.css

912 ms

jwplayer.js

jwplayer.js

754 ms

OneSignalSDK.js

OneSignalSDK.js

36 ms

trustseal.js

trustseal.js

1421 ms

ch01_01.jpg

ch01_01.jpg

180 ms

ch01_3.png

ch01_3.png

177 ms

ch01_04.png

ch01_04.png

779 ms

ch01_05.png

ch01_05.png

182 ms

ch01_03.png

ch01_03.png

180 ms

ch01_09.png

ch01_09.png

169 ms

n00166084-b.jpg

n00166084-b.jpg

778 ms

video_icon.png

video_icon.png

352 ms

n00166046-b.jpg

n00166046-b.jpg

780 ms

n00166012-b.jpg

n00166012-b.jpg

889 ms

picture_icon.png

picture_icon.png

361 ms

b00000194.jpg

b00000194.jpg

876 ms

b00000192.gif

b00000192.gif

1788 ms

b00000157.gif

b00000157.gif

1682 ms

b00000174.gif

b00000174.gif

1396 ms

b00000138.gif

b00000138.gif

1950 ms

b00000196.jpg

b00000196.jpg

1403 ms

b00000193.gif

b00000193.gif

1603 ms

b00000096.jpg

b00000096.jpg

1574 ms

n00165715-s.jpg

n00165715-s.jpg

1580 ms

n00165613-s.jpg

n00165613-s.jpg

1751 ms

n00165552-s.jpg

n00165552-s.jpg

1765 ms

b00000180.gif

b00000180.gif

1797 ms

b00000179.gif

b00000179.gif

1850 ms

b00000178.gif

b00000178.gif

2275 ms

n00166082-s.jpg

n00166082-s.jpg

1945 ms

n00165912-s.jpg

n00165912-s.jpg

1969 ms

n00165824-s.jpg

n00165824-s.jpg

1980 ms

n00166118-s.jpg

n00166118-s.jpg

2017 ms

n00166114-s.jpg

n00166114-s.jpg

2129 ms

n00166069-s.jpg

n00166069-s.jpg

2131 ms

n00166057-s.jpg

n00166057-s.jpg

2150 ms

n00166048-s.jpg

n00166048-s.jpg

2159 ms

n00166020-s.jpg

n00166020-s.jpg

2185 ms

n00166013-s.jpg

n00166013-s.jpg

2305 ms

n00166008-s.jpg

n00166008-s.jpg

2288 ms

IRANSansWeb(FaNum)_Medium.woff

IRANSansWeb(FaNum)_Medium.woff

2167 ms

n00166006-s.jpg

n00166006-s.jpg

2174 ms

n00166001-s.jpg

n00166001-s.jpg

2230 ms

n00166000-s.jpg

n00166000-s.jpg

2273 ms

n00165953-s.jpg

n00165953-s.jpg

2304 ms

n00165949-s.jpg

n00165949-s.jpg

2137 ms

n00165900-s.jpg

n00165900-s.jpg

2153 ms

n00165880-s.jpg

n00165880-s.jpg

1744 ms

n00165865-b.jpg

n00165865-b.jpg

1741 ms

n00152753-b.jpg

n00152753-b.jpg

1850 ms

n00146799-b.jpg

n00146799-b.jpg

1787 ms

n00154523-b.jpg

n00154523-b.jpg

1776 ms

Trustseal

Trustseal

425 ms

n00147507-b.jpg

n00147507-b.jpg

1297 ms

n00147448-b.jpg

n00147448-b.jpg

1283 ms

n00165933-b.jpg

n00165933-b.jpg

1126 ms

n00145277-b.jpg

n00145277-b.jpg

1228 ms

n00145259-b.jpg

n00145259-b.jpg

1240 ms

b00000155.gif

b00000155.gif

1165 ms

b00000052.gif

b00000052.gif

1104 ms

b00000188.gif

b00000188.gif

1645 ms

b00000184.jpg

b00000184.jpg

1094 ms

b00000131.gif

b00000131.gif

1362 ms

b00000152.gif

b00000152.gif

1172 ms

b00000129.gif

b00000129.gif

1086 ms

b00000166.gif

b00000166.gif

1079 ms

b00000151.gif

b00000151.gif

1092 ms

n00164536-b.jpg

n00164536-b.jpg

1221 ms

n00158102-b.jpg

n00158102-b.jpg

1180 ms

n00157644-b.jpg

n00157644-b.jpg

1080 ms

n00166069-b.jpg

n00166069-b.jpg

1108 ms

n00166057-b.jpg

n00166057-b.jpg

1186 ms

b00000195.gif

b00000195.gif

1210 ms

b00000070.gif

b00000070.gif

1192 ms

b00000183.jpg

b00000183.jpg

1117 ms

b00000190.gif

b00000190.gif

1301 ms

b00000158.gif

b00000158.gif

12834 ms

b00000012.gif

b00000012.gif

1193 ms

b00000182.gif

b00000182.gif

1153 ms

b00000175.gif

b00000175.gif

1343 ms

b00000156.gif

b00000156.gif

14275 ms

ch01_18.gif

ch01_18.gif

1222 ms

ch01_018.gif

ch01_018.gif

1250 ms

ch01_22.png

ch01_22.png

1275 ms

ch01_23.png

ch01_23.png

1357 ms

ch01_10.gif

ch01_10.gif

1399 ms

ch01_232.png

ch01_232.png

1297 ms

ch01_030.png

ch01_030.png

1307 ms

ch01_0013.png

ch01_0013.png

1380 ms

ch01_25.png

ch01_25.png

1414 ms

ch01_012.jpg

ch01_012.jpg

1410 ms

ch01_13.png

ch01_13.png

1451 ms

ch01_013.png

ch01_013.png

1408 ms

ch01_003.png

ch01_003.png

1439 ms

ch01_35.png

ch01_35.png

177 ms

Accessibility Review

naftema.com accessibility score

56

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

The document uses <meta http-equiv="refresh">

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

naftema.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

naftema.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FA

  • Language Claimed

    FA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Naftema.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Persian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Naftema.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

naftema.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Naftema. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: