5.4 sec in total
495 ms
4.7 sec
229 ms
Visit nalog2000.ru now to see the best up-to-date Nalog 2000 content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nalog2000.ru
Профессиональные бухгалтерские услуги: бухгалтерское обслуживание предприятий и предпринимателей, проверка и восстановление учета. 23 года работы. Доступные цены. Москва, Иркутск. | ЦБУиНП Консультант
Visit nalog2000.ruWe analyzed Nalog2000.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 495 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
nalog2000.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
45/100
10%
Value3.1 s
74/100
25%
Value9.9 s
10/100
10%
Value2,050 ms
7/100
30%
Value0.061
97/100
15%
Value18.2 s
3/100
10%
495 ms
514 ms
1218 ms
227 ms
451 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 41% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Nalog2000.ru, 11% (9 requests) were made to St6-21.vk.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Nalog2000.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 110.5 kB (17%)
648.2 kB
537.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Nalog2000.ru main page is 648.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 366.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 44.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.3 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nalog 2000 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 24.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 39.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nalog2000.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 39.1 kB or 26% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (61%)
74
29
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nalog 2000. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
nalog2000.ru
495 ms
nalog2000.ru
514 ms
www.nalog2000.ru
1218 ms
kernel_altasib.up.css
227 ms
template_fa12db97d345cf2570089c2873cda8c7.css
451 ms
jquery-1.8.3.min.js
480 ms
script_jq.js
366 ms
script.js
366 ms
common.css
373 ms
plugins.js
393 ms
common.js
562 ms
loader.js
946 ms
watch.js
1 ms
plusone.js
19 ms
ba.js
283 ms
cycounter
569 ms
tax.gif
221 ms
logo.gif
132 ms
main.jpg
248 ms
registracia_ooo.jpg
119 ms
registracia_ip.jpg
121 ms
buhuchet.jpg
120 ms
nalog_avd.jpg
236 ms
menukont_kb.gif
237 ms
menu_kb.gif
240 ms
page.gif
261 ms
naladv.jpg
436 ms
b_top_spec_moscow.gif
471 ms
documents.png
355 ms
obratnaya-svyaz.jpg
355 ms
call.png
367 ms
xls.gif
392 ms
informations_m.gif
473 ms
ul-li.png
473 ms
calc.gif
490 ms
captcha.php
575 ms
nalog_sprite.png
651 ms
hit
543 ms
openapi.318ba3d5a50b8d6990cb0284cb0e0963.js
232 ms
upload.gif
120 ms
widget_like.php
296 ms
widgets.js
93 ms
code.js
660 ms
5 ms
loader.js
817 ms
loader_nav21092343463_3.js
270 ms
lite.93f44416.css
645 ms
lang3_2.js
687 ms
c3d11fba.5504cac7.js
502 ms
vkui.388c7a16.css
704 ms
xdm.js
544 ms
widgets.d2d14ebe.css
545 ms
al_like.js
548 ms
base.ec2ae8ae.css
613 ms
counter2
142 ms
lite.bcf10ece3464fec8b554bde483fa2494.js
249 ms
sync-loader.js
848 ms
counter
142 ms
analytics.js
60 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
48 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
94 ms
fastbutton
90 ms
76040
297 ms
altasib_up1.gif
295 ms
bx_stat
291 ms
widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html
93 ms
dyn-goal-config.js
173 ms
spacer.gif
163 ms
like_widget.png
93 ms
collect
48 ms
upload.gif
102 ms
settings
173 ms
postmessageRelay
43 ms
js
69 ms
developers.google.com
420 ms
544727282-postmessagerelay.js
28 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
12 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
78 ms
button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js
21 ms
76040
173 ms
embeds
44 ms
tweet_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.ru.html
37 ms
tracker
142 ms
nalog2000.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
nalog2000.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
nalog2000.ru SEO score
RU
RU
WINDOWS-1251
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nalog2000.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nalog2000.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
nalog2000.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Nalog 2000. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: